Detective and mystery stories; England -- Fiction; Inheritance and succession -- Fiction; Landowners -- Fiction
Rupert felt very uncomfortable. It was bad enough to have Mrs. Beatson
in the house, when he knew how treacherous she was; but it was worse
to entertain Carrington as his guest. The barrister undoubtedly was
determined to make money at the cost of honor. And what was more, he
would probably gain his ends, unless the truth came to light. And the
truth required to adjust matters was to learn beyond question what was
the name of the individual who had murdered the vicar. If, indeed,
Mallien was the culprit, Rupert felt that he was in Carrington's
power. It was impossible to allow that truth to come to Lawson's ears,
as then Mallien would be arrested and there would be a public scandal.
Yet if Carrington, who knew all details, were not bribed largely to
keep silence, it seemed likely that he would denounce the miserable
man. Of course, as yet, Hendle could not be certain that his cousin
had committed the crime; but circumstances were against him, and if
the police took up the matter, ruin would stare Mallien in the face.
For Dorinda's sake such publicity was not to be thought of for one
moment.
Hendle had no love for his cousin, who was as disagreeable and selfish
a mortal as ever existed. He was capable of the most unscrupulous
conduct to feed his egotism, but Rupert thought--and with some degree
of truth--that the very egotism in question would prevent the man from
risking his neck. Yet, even if he were innocent, as Rupert tried hard
to believe for Dorinda's sake, the evidence against him was very
strong. Mallien, thanks to Mrs. Beatson, knew all about the will
before Leigh's death; the discovery of the ornament, near the sundial,
proved that he had been where the will was buried. Also possession of
the will meant a fortune to Mallien, and the sole reason for which the
vicar could have been murdered was for the criminal to obtain
possession of the parchment. Indeed, it was very certain that if
Inspector Lawson became possessed of these facts, he would not have
the slightest compunction in arresting Mallien, and in doing his best
to have him hanged. The evidence was certainly purely circumstantial,
but so strong that Rupert felt convinced both judge and jury would
accept it as positive truth. And, failing Mrs. Beatson, whom the
Squire did not believe to be guilty, it really looked as though
Mallien with his greedy nature and bad temper had struck the fatal
blow. Never was a man in such a dilemma.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account