The Louvre: Fifty Plates in ColourBrockwell, Maurice W.
History
The Louvre: Fifty Plates in Colour
Brockwell, Maurice W.
Musée du Louvre
Neither Petrus Christus (1412?-1473), the only master who was directly
influenced by Jan van Eyck, nor Robert Campin (1365-1444), who is now
known to be identical with the so-called “Maître de Flémalle,” and
who was the head of the important Tournai school, are represented
at the Louvre. The official Catalogue ascribes to Campin’s greatest
pupil, Rogier van der Weyden (_c._ 1400-1464), the two panels _The
Virgin and Child_ (No. 2195), and _The Deposition from the Cross_ (No.
2196), of which at least the former is only a school version of an
often repeated theme by the master, whilst the _Deposition_ is by no
means an important example of his work. Rogier was born at Tournai,
but went to Brussels after 1432, and practised in that city until his
death in 1464. A journey to Italy in 1449 did not appreciably affect
his art, which always retained an archaic flavour, especially in the
rather tortured rendering of the nude. In this respect, and also in
his utter disregard of beauty (except the beauty of rhythmic line), he
compares unfavourably with the brothers Van Eyck, as may be clearly
seen on comparing his work with Jan van Eyck’s _Virgin and Donor_. His
occasional use of gold backgrounds, as in the _Virgin and Child_ (No.
2195), is another archaic trait.
The hand of a nameless contemporary and follower of Campin and Rogier
van der Weyden, who is also represented at the Galleries of Vienna,
Turin, and Antwerp, is to be recognised in the small panel of _The
Annunciation_ (No. 2202), which was formerly attributed to the much
later painter Lucas van Leyden, and has also been claimed to be only a
copy of a picture by the Maître de Flémalle.
HANS MEMLINC
The influence of Rogier van der Weyden determined the entire course
taken by the Flemish school until its decline with the introduction
of those Italian Renaissance tendencies which only became a vital
factor and led to the birth of a new Flemish art through the genius of
Rubens. Again, Rogier’s chief pupil, Dierick Bouts (_c._ 1410-1475),
is unrepresented at the Louvre. In the art of Hans Memlinc (_c._
1430?-1494), who was the founder of the great school of Bruges, may be
found clear traces of the influence of Rogier and of Bouts, although
we have no certain knowledge as to that master’s actual pupilage. He
may have been born at Mömlingen, near Aschaffenburg on the Main, and
apparently had already risen to fame as a painter before 1467, the
date of his great altarpiece at Dantzig. By that time he was settled
at Bruges. Mr. W. H. J. Weale’s researches have shown that the legend,
according to which Memlinc first came to Bruges as a wounded soldier
and was nursed back to health at the Hospital of St. John, is not
founded on fact. It is probable that Memlinc served his apprenticeship
under some Cologne painter, but all theories regarding his early life
must remain largely conjectural.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account