The love-affairs of the Condés (1530-1740)Williams, H. Noel (Hugh Noel)
History
The love-affairs of the Condés (1530-1740)
Williams, H. Noel (Hugh Noel)
Conde family; France -- History -- Bourbons, 1589-1789
“When I knew that you were living as an honourable princess, and
were respecting such a husband, a member of so great a family,
I desired to do you service, and I esteemed myself happy. But
now that I see you thus accused, if your justification does not
appease this widespread rumour of so iniquitous a deed, I have
received too much honour from the late Monseigneur my husband to
be willing that any one should surpass me in the desire to be
the most cruel enemy that you have ever had, although I shall
nevertheless weep for your disgrace.... And if you have been
instigated to this crime, as is reported, hasten to denounce
those who have given you this pernicious counsel, for the sake
of your life and honour; and I shall implore God to punish the
guilty and protect the innocent.
“From Paris this IX. April 1588.
“She who was formerly your mother-in-law to do you service.
“FRANÇOISE D’ORLÉANS”[131]
CHAPTER X
The King of Navarre appoints a special commission for the trial
of Brilland--Brilland is put to the question--His confessions
under torture implicate the Princesse de Condé, but on the
following day he disavows them--He is found guilty and condemned
to be dismembered by horses--The princess denies the competency
of the court and appeals to the Parlement of Paris--But the King
of Navarre and the commissioners ignore the decrees of that
body--The commission directs that the princess shall be brought
to trial--She gives birth to a son--The prosecution is dropped,
but the princess remains in captivity--The Président de Thou
interests himself in her case--Means by which he obtains from
Henri IV. the recognition of her son’s rights, and, with them,
the acknowledgment of the princess’s innocence.
After ordering the arrest of the Princesse de Condé, the King of
Navarre appointed a special commission, composed of twelve judges, for
the trial of Brilland; while, as the accused had protested against
his examination being conducted by Fiefbrun, who appears to have been
a personal enemy, Henri replaced him by Valette, Grand Provost of
Navarre, the more willingly since he was aware that Fiefbrun was a
devoted partisan of the princess.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account