Didn’t I consistently urge that free love is for daring and devoted spirits only? And what wonders have not the bold and brave done for our sex in the last thirty years! Look how the market value of men has fallen and how the market value of women has risen, if I may use the crude language of Mazie Ross. No longer do women live, as did our grandmothers, for the sole purpose of "charming" men or of sipping the nectar of their "homage." Pray observe, dear child, that I never decried marriage in the case of the few women who are strong enough to command the legal tyrant instead of submitting to him, and who thus are in a position to straighten out the irrational knot from the inside. As for the common rule of females, if they _will_ go on flocking to the altar in droves, if they _will_ be infatuated with marriage after we have opened their eyes to man—why, let them rush in where angels fear to tread. And let them take the consequences, too. Small blame to the nuptial fire if it scorches the likes of _them_. Is the flame guilty because the moths dash in? But now for the news, although there is precious little. First, Lydia Dyson has produced a new novel—and a new baby. You know she lets this happen (I mean the baby) every once in so often because she says it is the only way to keep her complexion perfect. (It really is a perfect olive, in spite of the quantities of gold-tipped cigarettes she smokes.) The baby, like its predecessors, has been given out for adoption to a childless couple in good circumstances, Lydia contending (_a la_ Rousseau) that an artist makes a very unsatisfactory parent. Lydia’s other achievement, her novel, "The Mother Soul," has been running serially in the _Good Householder_. It’s netting her the usual mint of money, ten thousand dollars down, to say nothing of copious extras in the shape of book and dramatic royalties. There’s Lydia for you, flourishing like the green bay tree! Not like your poor Cornelia, who’d be happy enough to take the child and let the royalties go. Robert is rarely here nowadays. Charlotte Beecher, therefore, doesn’t show up often, and so, what with you and Claude in Europe, I’d be monarch of all I surveyed, if Hercules didn’t take pity on me and come in to drive the blue devils away. He spoils me almost as much as you did. A dear, dutiful boy he is, as fond of work as a camel. I feel conscience-stricken when I think how lightly I accept his devotion. Ought I to make him happy? Ah, well-a-day! I’m sometimes tempted—ah, _how_ I’m tempted! But a poor soulless thing like me mustn’t think of such things.