The love of an uncrowned queen : $b Sophie Dorothea, consort of George I, and her correspondence with Philip Christopher, Count KönigsmarckWilkins, W. H. (William Henry)
History
The love of an uncrowned queen : $b Sophie Dorothea, consort of George I, and her correspondence with Philip Christopher, Count Königsmarck
Wilkins, W. H. (William Henry)
Königsmarck, Christopher von, 1665-1694; Sophia Dorothea, consort of George I, King of Great Britain, 1666-1726
Again, Palmblad makes the assertion, “Of Königsmarck’s _liaison_ with
the Countess Platen the letters do not say a word”. Here again it is
evident he has made a mistake in the cypher, and confused the Countess
with some one else, for, as will be seen, the letters teem with
allusions to Countess Platen (either as _La Perspective_ or as 202), and
there are frequent references to an understanding or flirtation between
her and Königsmarck. The Princess is again and again inflamed with
jealousy on this account, and reproaches her lover bitterly, while he is
equally fluent with his excuses.
But the gravest inaccuracy is yet to come. In his survey of the letters
Palmblad made no attempt to classify them or arrange them in order of
date—a task which he declares to be “impossible”. As he had little
knowledge of Hanoverian history at the time the letters were written, or
of contemporary events, the task was doubtless impossible to him; he
would therefore have done wisely to have left it alone altogether, and
not have tried to cover his ignorance by the wildest guesswork. Yet this
is what he has done. He says: “In one letter mention is made of Bussche,
who was the trusty friend and confidant of Prince George, and who died
in the beginning of the year 1688, and four other letters have the year
1693 given, so we know with certainty that the correspondence was spread
over a period of six years”. And again: “In the letter in which Bussche
is mentioned, therefore, written before or during the year 1687,
Königsmarck is on the most trusted footing with the Princess; and in the
year 1685 Königsmarck was evidently in Hanover; and soon after that it
appears that the very close intimacy between them began. The Princess,
her daughter, who afterwards married the King of Prussia, was born March
16, 1686;[61] and it is a matter of surmise and strong doubt whether the
family of Prussian kings spring from the Guelph or Königsmarck blood.”
The whole of this theory is built upon the surmise that the Bussche
mentioned (not in one letter only, but at least a dozen) was the same
Bussche who married Countess Platen’s sister, and who died early in
1688.
-----
Footnote 61:
This is an error, she was born in 1687.
-----
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account