The love of an uncrowned queen : $b Sophie Dorothea, consort of George I, and her correspondence with Philip Christopher, Count KönigsmarckWilkins, W. H. (William Henry)
History
The love of an uncrowned queen : $b Sophie Dorothea, consort of George I, and her correspondence with Philip Christopher, Count Königsmarck
Wilkins, W. H. (William Henry)
Königsmarck, Christopher von, 1665-1694; Sophia Dorothea, consort of George I, King of Great Britain, 1666-1726
“You wish me, I believe, to tell you about my affairs. Yesterday I
read over my marriage contract; it could hardly be more
disadvantageous to me. The Prince is absolutely master of everything,
for there is nothing I can dispose of without his consent. Even the
clause about my dower is so badly worded that they can easily cheat me
and take it away.[208] I was very much surprised at this unexpected
blow, and so hurt that tears started to my eyes. My mother was moved,
and tried to comfort me; nothing could be more tender or kind than
what she said to me. She even went so far as to offer to sell her
jewels so as to settle on me some sort of an income. At last we
decided it would be better to speak to my father first, as perhaps he
would be able to put the matter right. My mother did so this morning,
and his answer was favourable. I hope I shall get what I want. My
mother advised me to talk to Stubenfol, and ask him to push the thing
also, to show him my marriage contract, and point out how unjust it is
to me; so that without any one being able to guess my plans, I have
the finest pretext ever known.”
-----
Footnote 208:
A fragment of this letter relating to the Princess’s marriage
settlement is quoted (in the original French) by Palmblad in his
_Aurora Königsmarck_, and Dr. Köcher has seized on it as an inaccuracy
which goes to prove that the letters are not genuine. Yet it is
substantially correct. The Duke of Celle was undoubtedly beguiled into
a marriage contract most unfavourable to his daughter. He gave her a
marriage portion of one hundred thousand thalers and the estates
already settled on her. The hundred thousand thalers promptly went
into the Hanoverian coffers (there was no Married Woman’s Property Act
in those days). The estates were not disposed of so easily. If no son
were born, these estates, particularly the lordship of Wilhelmsburg,
were to remain the Princess’s; and should the Prince die before his
consort, this property and all its revenues were to revert to his
widow, and her children could only inherit them after her death, and,
as a widow, the Princess was to be entitled to a dower of twelve
thousand thalers. But the Princess had a son, Prince George Augustus,
and so these estates were locked up; she could not realise them or
raise money on them in any way. She was not likely to become a widow
(however devoutly she might hope for that consummation), and so she
was penniless, with nothing of her own save the allowance the Elector
of Hanover thought fit to dole out to her for her dress and petty
expenses. Her father, of course, might subsidise her occasionally, but
that was merely a matter of his good-will. Hence her efforts to obtain
a sufficient sum to enable her to set up a separate establishment and
be independent. In this, as in other things, the evidence is all in
favour of the absolute genuineness of these letters.
-----
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account