The love of an uncrowned queen : $b Sophie Dorothea, consort of George I, and her correspondence with Philip Christopher, Count KönigsmarckWilkins, W. H. (William Henry)
History
The love of an uncrowned queen : $b Sophie Dorothea, consort of George I, and her correspondence with Philip Christopher, Count Königsmarck
Wilkins, W. H. (William Henry)
Königsmarck, Christopher von, 1665-1694; Sophia Dorothea, consort of George I, King of Great Britain, 1666-1726
comment nous sortirons de cette affaire._ I take Him as witness that I
fear not the peril I run. But to lose you for ever, that is what
distresses me!
“If I wished to go away from you, it was because I might be able to
help you better at a distance than if I were near. They might imprison
me perhaps, but that is a ridiculous thought; I will not dream of it.
I was admiring you last evening, watching you laughing before that
mirror in so merry a mood; yet all the time I was trembling, for I
thought that the Elector and your mother were already talking about
that letter, and were planning how to punish us. Your cheerfulness
makes me suspect many things: sometimes I think you will not see me
for a long time and little by little detach yourself from me. Other
thoughts come into my head whereof I will not write to you. I am so
troubled because of that accident that my brain is in a whirl. To
crown it all, Madame Goritz has told me that she knows I hid
_incognito_ three days in the town without showing myself, and the
people I employed in my intrigue had betrayed me, and a dozen things
beside; it would take too long to write it all. This, added to the
loss of your note, makes me beside myself. If among all my sorrows I
had not the one of fearing that you might weary of me, I should
console myself in spite of everything, but that thought finishes me.
Should they begin to question La Confidente as to whether I have
written to her sometimes, she must say at once that I wrote to her
several times from Flanders, but not from here. My brother-in-law
[Count Lewenhaupt] must be apprised of the same thing, so that we may
not betray ourselves. It is necessary my brother-in-law should know
what to answer in case he should be questioned, and know to whom the
letters were addressed which my lacquey brought him. I shall say that
when I went away I asked him to give the letters addressed to the
‘Frole Crunbuglen’ to a woman who would ask for them under that name,
and he sent on to me the answers the woman brought, without asking
from whom the letters came. He must say neither more nor less. If I do
not make my meaning clear, I must have a word with you, for it is wise
to take precautions in time, lest we be discovered. You must deny ever
having written to me at all, but La Confidente must not deny that I
have spoken about you, in case they ask what I have written to her.”
“[HANOVER, undated.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account