The love of an uncrowned queen : $b Sophie Dorothea, consort of George I, and her correspondence with Philip Christopher, Count KönigsmarckWilkins, W. H. (William Henry)
History
The love of an uncrowned queen : $b Sophie Dorothea, consort of George I, and her correspondence with Philip Christopher, Count Königsmarck
Wilkins, W. H. (William Henry)
Königsmarck, Christopher von, 1665-1694; Sophia Dorothea, consort of George I, King of Great Britain, 1666-1726
At the court of Hanover, as we have seen, there were plots and
counterplots; in addition to the women’s squabbles, father was arrayed
against son and son against father, and brother against brother. Among
the unruly sons of Ernest Augustus, Sophie Dorothea had her friends, and
the young princes for the most part hated Countess Platen quite as much
as she did. Of them all, Maximilian was the most ungovernable, and had
an unlimited capacity for getting into scrapes. Though well preserved,
Countess Platen was by this time past her first youth, and she had
recourse to divers means to heighten her charms, milk baths, artificial
roses, and cosmetics. The rouge-pot, like dram-drinking, grows with
habit, and the lady’s cheeks became so ruddy that they were the byword
of the court. There was a quaint conceit that the water peas were boiled
in was an infallible test of rouge, and the monkeyish Max, having a
grudge against the Countess, procured a bottle of this decoction from
the kitchen, and on the occasion of a court ceremonial, when she
appeared in full war paint, he squirted some in her face, with the
result that she had to retire amid the suppressed titters of the
assembly. The Countess, boiling with rage, complained to Ernest
Augustus, and the offender was severely reprimanded and locked up in his
room for many days. The punishment was not a heavy one, but it served to
engender bad blood between the father and son, and after he was
liberated we find Maximilian intriguing with his two brothers, Augustus
and Charles, against his eldest brother, George Louis, and his father.
Ernest Augustus’s great desire was to add to the lustre of the House of
Brunswick-Lüneburg. To this end he sought to unite the duchies of Celle
and Hanover, and he established primogeniture. He made his eldest son
heir to all lands and territory, and only allotted to his other sons
moderate sums of money whereby to support their dignity. This policy was
the opposite to that pursued by his ancestors and by most of the German
princes of his time, who in their wills were in the habit of dividing
their territory among all their sons. It is no wonder, therefore, that
the younger princes of Brunswick-Lüneburg disliked the innovation,
protested noisily against it, and intrigued for its overthrow. The
Duchess Sophia also disliked it. The disaffection was this time nipped
in the bud by the vigilance of Countess Platen, who tried to implicate
Sophie Dorothea in the plot, but nothing could be proved against her. It
is possible that she had a hand in it, for the terms of her marriage
settlement, which practically cut her off from inheriting territory, and
left her at the mercy of her husband, were so unfavourable that she
might be pardoned if she tried to alter them to her advantage.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account