Admit, just for argument's sake, that a husband was entitled to put away
his guilty wife; and suppose that the guilty man were willing to marry
her. What then? Could one doom the guilty parties to a perpetual living
in sin?
But the ray of light petered out, leaving her in even blacker darkness,
because--by the beam of it--she had seen herself already drifted so far
away from her old beliefs as to countenance not only divorce but the
remarriage of divorced parties.
All the same, mother-love still urged her to forgive: so that, for a
full week, she went about her house (a lonely house, it seemed now; all
the charm of the years gone out of it) in a positive stupor of
intellectual and religious bewilderment. She asked herself: "Does
anything matter except my boy's happiness, my boy's career? Does
anything really count except love? Isn't love--and love alone--the true
teaching of Christianity!" But she found no answer to her questions.
Honesty said: "It's a matter of principle; judge the case as though it
were a stranger's, not the case of your own son."
Nevertheless the argument of the individual case persisted. Memory
recalled her son's statement about Aliette's relationship to her
husband. If those two--the woman to whom she had taken such an
instinctive liking and the man she had deemed, at first sight, capable
of cruelty--were husband and wife only in name, didn't the case alter?
"No!" said formal religion. "Yes!" said the mother in Julia Cavendish.
She remembered a phrase of Aliette's: "I have no children, worse luck."
That was hardly the phrase of a loose woman, of a harpy. Suppose this
woman really loved Ronnie?
But that brought back the old jealousy. How could Aliette really love
Ronnie? She, his mother, would have held her right hand in the flames
rather than jeopardize her son's career--as Aliette had jeopardized it.
Whereupon the novelist's imagination in Julia started to activity. She
pictured--knowing little of the law--a crowd of clients besieging
Ronnie's chambers, only to be told that "the eminent Mr. Cavendish"
could not take their cases; and--thoroughly frightened at the heroic
version of Benjamin Bunce and those few dusty briefs which Ronald had
abandoned--sent for her secretary, the blank-faced Mrs. Sanderson, whom
she told to ring up Sir Peter Wilberforce.
But Sir Peter was in Paris; and James deputized in his stead.
"Do you know what she wants to see him about?" asked James's secretary
on the telephone.
"It's about her will, I think," answered Julia's.
2
Jimmy Wilberforce, who had not seen Mollie since his talk with Bunce and
spent four sleepless nights in consequence, set out for that interview
with the uncomfortable foreboding that the "old lady's will" was only a
pretext for discussing the old lady's son. And the foreboding justified
itself before he had been with her ten minutes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account