Bertram Standon--he had so far refused two titles and owned one Derby
winner--was apparently much exercised over "this unfortunate woman, Mrs.
Towers." "I feel convinced," he wrote to his friend, Sir Peter
Wilberforce, Bart., who had turned the letter over to his partner, "that
she is more sinned against than sinning; and in the cause of honest
justice, no less than in the cause of honest journalism, I have decided
that--should the coroner's court bring in a verdict of wilful murder
against her or the ex-sailor, Fielding--I will put all my personal
resources, and all the resources of my paper, at their disposal. Will
you therefore have the case watched on my behalf, and, should the
verdict go as I am afraid it will, take any steps you consider
necessary."
"A stunt, I should imagine," decided Cartwright, "and not a very new
stunt at that. Bottomley, you may remember, once did the same thing.
Still, it may not be a stunt. Standon's a curious fellow. Sometimes his
heart gets away with his brain. It certainly has in this case."
"You think Lucy Towers and Fielding guilty then?"
"Not a doubt, I should say. Still, that's not our affair. Our job is to
give Standon as good a run as we can for his money. The inquest, I see,
has been adjourned for a week. When it comes on again you'll have to go
down."
"Can't I see the prisoners beforehand?"
"Better not, as I take our instructions."
"But we might get them off at the inquest."
"Where would Bertram Standon's stunt come in if we did?" said John
Cartwright satirically, and so closed the interview.
2
During the week which preceded the adjourned inquest on William Towers,
Bertram Standon held his journalistic hand; and--Fleet Street being
momentarily occupied with the controversy of "Submarines _v._
Battleships"--no further details of the tragedy became available.
Reperusing the week-end papers of an evening, it seemed to Ronnie that
the case against the woman--whose likeness to Aliette waned and waned
the more one scrutinized her photograph--looked black enough. Apparently
she had shot her husband during an altercation in another man's room.
The other man, a sailor who had lost both his arms in the war, was her
cousin, and--the reports suggested--her lover.
All the same, the "vulgar murder-case" continued to excite both his
personalities: the magisterial Cavendish because of a curious inward
conviction--the conviction he had voiced to Wilberforce--that "the woman
was no murderess": and the imaginative Wixton because if the coroner's
jury found her guilty he might at last get his chance--slim though that
chance appeared--of a big forensic victory.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account