The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American RevolutionStark, James Henry
History
The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American Revolution
Stark, James Henry
American loyalists -- Massachusetts; Massachusetts -- Politics and government -- 1775-1783
As we review the conflict we are apt to forget that the Americans were
not alone in their efforts to throw off the restraint of law and
authority of the government during the twenty years preceding the
surrender at Yorktown; Wilkes, "Junius," and Lord George Gordon
surpassed the efforts of Patrick Henry, Sam Adams, and Crispus Attucks,
to make life unpleasant for King George. Mobs surged about the streets
of London as they did in Boston, defying the law, destroying property,
and disturbing the public peace. The house of Lord Mansfield, chief
justice of England, was wrecked and burned to the ground in the same
manner as the home of Thomas Hutchinson, chief justice of Massachusetts,
was wrecked and pillaged. Both mobs claimed to act "on principle," and
there is a curious likeness in the details of these two acts of
violence. It was an age of insurrection, with no political genius able,
or in a position, to direct the storm. During the Wilkes riots, in 1768,
the civil power in England was reduced to extreme weakness. Lecky tells
us "there were great fears that all the bulwarks of order would yield to
the strain," and Franklin, then in London, said that if Wilkes had
possessed a good character and the king a bad one, Wilkes would have
driven George III. from the throne. In 1780, during the Gordon riots,
chaos came again to London, and all England was threatened with anarchy.
The time was out of joint on both continents, and George III. was not
born to set it right. We may be sure there is something more serious
than glory in all this turmoil that embittered the most beneficent of
civilizing races. Whoever examines the dispute with impartial care, will
probably perceive that the time had come for a new adjustment of the
constitutional relations of the several parts of the British Empire, but
the temper of George III. and the disorderly elements, active both in
England and America, were unfavorable to rational treatment of the great
problem.
Early in the Revolution it was considered necessary, in order to insure
its success, to obtain aid and recognition from the French.
Mr. Silas Deane, of Connecticut, and three agents, were sent to France
to feel the pulse of the king and nation upon the subject. They,
however, neither acknowledged the agents nor directed them to leave the
kingdom.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account