The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American RevolutionStark, James Henry
History
The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American Revolution
Stark, James Henry
American loyalists -- Massachusetts; Massachusetts -- Politics and government -- 1775-1783
All who were concerned in the passage of the treaty were the subjects of
the popular wrath. Jay was declared to be an "arch traitor," a "Judas
who had betrayed his country with a kiss," and was burned in effigy in a
dozen cities. Hamilton was stoned; the name of Washington was hooted,
and the British flag dragged in the mud.
Edmund Quincy, in the life of his father, says, "The fall of Bonaparte,
although it occasioned as genuine joy to New England as to the mother
country herself, did not bring with it absolutely unalloyed
satisfaction." There was reason to apprehend that the English
administration, triumphant over its gigantic foe, its army and navy
released from the incessant service of so many years, might concentrate
the whole of the empire upon the power which it regarded as a volunteer
ally of its mighty enemy, and administer an exemplary chastisement. No
doubt many Englishmen felt, with Sir Walter Scott, that "it was their
business to give the Americans a fearful memento, that the babe unborn
should have remembered," and there is as little question that infinite
damage might have been done to our cities and seacoast and to the banks
of our great rivers, had Great Britain employed her entire naval and
military forces for that purpose. But happily the English people wisely
refrained from an expenditure of blood and gold which could have no
permanent good result, and which would only serve to exasperate passions
and to prolong animosities which it was far wiser to permit to die out.
It is not unlikely that the attention of English people had been so
absorbed by the mighty conflict going on at their very doors that they
had not much to spare for the distant and comparatively obscure fields
across the Atlantic, and indeed the sentiments of the English people and
the policy of English governments have never exhibited a spirit of
revengefulness. The American war was but a slight episode in the great
epic of the age. At any rate the English ministry were content to treat
with the American commissioners at Ghent and to make a peace which left
untouched the pretended occasion for the war, over in expressive
silence, and peace was concluded, leaving "sailors' rights" the great
watchword of the war party, substantially as they stood before
hostilities began, except that our fishermen were deprived of the
valuable privilege they enjoyed of catching and curing fish on the
shores of the Gulf of the St. Lawrence.[94]
[94] Life of Josiah Quincy, p. 358.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account