The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American RevolutionStark, James Henry
History
The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American Revolution
Stark, James Henry
American loyalists -- Massachusetts; Massachusetts -- Politics and government -- 1775-1783
It must be admitted that in building a navy the government connived at
the building of cruisers, such as the Alabama, in British shipyards, for
which they had to pay dearly afterwards. In answer to this speech of
Gladstone, the robust yet tender tones of John Bright's voice rang out
for the Northern cause in the darkest hour of the Civil War. His voice
was heard with no uncertain sound when he uttered his indignant protest
at anything like a reception being tendered Mason and Slidell on their
release. John Bright for a long time sustained the enormous loss of
keeping his mills open at hast half time with no material to work with.
There he stood, all Quaker as he was, praying that the North might not
stay its hand till the last slave was freed, even if no bales of cotton
were sent to relieve his grievious losses protesting against outside
interference. When the day came that marked the passing away of this
venerable patriot, one of earth's greatest and best, an attempt was made
in Congress to pass a vote of sympathy to his family and to the shame
and disgrace of the United States it must be said that Congress refused
to pay even this poor tribute to the memory of the best friend the
United States had in the whole wide world in the hour of her great
distress. This was done because it would be "offensive to the Irish."
John Bright could see no difference between dis-union in the United
States and dis-union in the United Kingdom. He had written to Mr.
Gladstone concerning Parnell, Dillon, O'Brien, etc., saying, "You deem
them patriots; I hold them not to be patriots, but conspirators against
the crown and government of the United Kingdom." These men were
afterwards found guilty of criminal conspiracy and Parnell was received
with honor on the floor of Congress.
Henry Ward Beecher stated that during the American Civil War there were
thousands of mass meetings held in Great Britain in favor of the Union
cause, and not one in favor of the Confederacy.
Jefferson Davis complained bitterly of the action of Great Britain. He
says "The partiality of Her Majesty's government in favor of our enemies
was further evinced in the marked difference of its conduct on the
subject of the purchase of supplies by the two belligerents. This
difference was conspicuous from the commencement of the war."(*) Great
Britain endeavored to deal justly with both parties in the contest, but
pleased neither and was blamed by both. This is probably the best
evidence that can be given to show the impartiality of Great Britain in
the great Civil War, and it is safe to say that there were ten times
more British subjects serving in the Northern armies than there were in
the Southern.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account