The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American RevolutionStark, James Henry
History
The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American Revolution
Stark, James Henry
American loyalists -- Massachusetts; Massachusetts -- Politics and government -- 1775-1783
The odds were greatly against the British negotiator. His principal
adversary was Daniel Webster, Secretary of State, who in one of his
letters said: "I must be permitted to say that few questions have arisen
under this government in regard to which a stronger or more general
conviction was felt that the country was in the right than this question
of the northeast boundary." He reiterated his own belief in "the justice
of the claim which arose from our honest conviction that it was founded
in truth and accorded with the intention of the negotiators of the
treaty of 1783." The whole of the disputed territory amounted to
6,750,000 acres. At last a compromise was effected which granted to
Great Britain 3,337,000 acres, and to the United States 3,413,000 acres,
and acknowledged the title of England to all the military positions upon
the frontier, and 700,000 acres more was awarded her than was assigned
to her by the King of the Netherlands.
But the decision of the Commissioners suited neither party. The factions
in England pronounced Lord Ashburton to have been sold, and those in
America declared that Webster had been bought. The most violent
opposition to the treaty was made; every part of it was denounced, and
it became at last doubtful if the Senate would ratify it. That final
consummation was, however, suddenly effected in a most remarkable
manner, the Senate coming to its decision by an unexpected majority of
thirty-nine to nine, after several days of secret debate. The sanction
of the Queen and the British government had been given without
hesitation and the people on both sides of the Atlantic were well
satisfied with the termination of the long and virulent dispute, and the
Northeastern Boundary Question would have sunk into the archives of
diplomatic history, but truth like murder will out, and it so happened
that Mr. Thomas Colley Grattan, British Consul for Massachusetts[99]
who, at the request of the commissioners, had accompanied them to
Washington to assist them in their negotiation, had the fortune to
discover after the treaty was signed, the duplicity of the Senate during
their secret debates leading to the ratification of the treaty. He says:
"My informant gave unmeasured expression to his indignation, which he
assured me was fully shared in by his friends, Judge Story and Dr.
Channing. Judge Story expressed himself without reserve on Webster's
conduct as a 'most disgraceful proceeding.'" Other gentlemen of Boston
entirely coincided in these opinions.
[99] For full particulars see his work, "Civilized America," Vol. I,
Chap. XXI, XXII, XXIII.
[Illustration: Map of the Boundary Line between Maine and New
Brunswick.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account