The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American RevolutionStark, James Henry
History
The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American Revolution
Stark, James Henry
American loyalists -- Massachusetts; Massachusetts -- Politics and government -- 1775-1783
Public attention being aroused by the statements made by the British
Consul to his government, the injunction of secrecy imposed by the
Senate on its members was dissolved, and permission was given for the
publication of the speeches made in secret session of August 17-19,
1842. The most important of those speeches was that of Mr. Rives,
chairman of the Committee on Foreign Affairs. His principal argument was
that if they did not sign the treaty, the dispute would be referred to a
second arbitration with very great danger of their losing the whole, Mr.
Webster, the Secretary of State, having sent to him to be laid before
the Senate a communication and a copy of the map presented by Dr.
Franklin to Count de Vergennes. In short, it is exactly the line
contended for by Great Britain except that it concedes more than is
claimed. When this communication was read, Senator Benton informed the
Senate that he could produce a map of higher validity than the one
referred to. He accordingly repaired to the library of Congress and soon
returned with a map which there is no doubt was the one sent by Franklin
to Jefferson already alluded to as having been surreptitiously removed
from the archives of the State Department some years before. The moment
it was examined it was found to sustain, by the most precise and
remarkable correspondence in every feature, the map communicated by Mr.
Webster. Mr. Benton then stated that "if the maps were really authentic
the concealment of them was a fraud on the British, and that the Senate
was insulted by being a party to the fraud," and further that "if
evidence had been discovered which deprived Maine of the title to
one-third of its territory, honor required that it should be made known
to the British."
The sudden acceptance of the treaty was in consequence of the evidence
of the maps, and the conviction of all concerned that a discovery of
their existence before the conclusion of a treaty would have given
irresistible strength to the English claims.
Calhoun said: "It would be idle to suppose that these disclosures would
not weigh heavily against the United States in any future negotiations."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account