The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American RevolutionStark, James Henry
History
The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American Revolution
Stark, James Henry
American loyalists -- Massachusetts; Massachusetts -- Politics and government -- 1775-1783
The affair of the Hutchinson Letter created great excitement both in
America and England, an affair in which the best men of Massachusetts
Bay were concerned, including Franklin, then the agent of his native
Province, although a citizen then of Pennsylvania; a shade has rested
therefrom upon the character of Franklin, which cannot yet be said to
have been explained away. Is it creditable that those wary, able men,
Franklin, Samuel Adams, Bowdoin, John Adams, Samuel Cooper, and others,
really thought the very quiet statements contained "in the letters in
which there was no sentiment which the Governor had not openly expressed
in his addresses to the Legislature, was a danger and menace to the
welfare of the colony?"[130] The only explanation is that they had
persuaded themselves that Hutchinson was so dangerous that if conduct
thoroughly above board would not answer, he must be cast out by
questionable means. Mr. Winthrop justifies their conduct by believing
that it may be classed among what Burke calls "irregular things done in
the confusion of mighty troubles, not to be justified on
principle."[130] When the printed copies of the letter arrived in
England they excited great astonishment. Thomas Whatley was dead.
William Whatley, his brother, and executor was filled with a very
natural consternation, at a theft which was likely to have such
important consequences, and for which public opinion was inclined to
make him responsible. He in turn suspected a certain Mr. Temple, who had
been allowed to look through the papers of his deceased brother, for the
purpose of perusing one relating to the colonies, and a duel ensued in
which Whatley was severely wounded. Mr. Temple continued to be
suspected. A letter of Jan. 4, 1774, says: "Although when they first
came abroad his own brother said: Whoever sent them was a d----d
villian."[131]
[130] New Eng. Hist. and Gen. Reg. I., p. 307.
[131] Hosmer's Life of Hutchinson, p. 274
Franklin then for the first time, in a letter to a newspaper, disclosed
the part he had taken. He stated that "he, and he alone, had obtained
and transmitted to Boston the letters in question, that they had never
passed into the hands of William Whatley, and that, therefore, it was
impossible, either that Whatley could have communicated them, or that
Temple could have taken them, from his papers." There is some reason to
believe that the original owner had left them carelessly in a public
office, whence they had been stolen, but the mystery was never
decisively solved.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account