The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American RevolutionStark, James Henry
History
The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American Revolution
Stark, James Henry
American loyalists -- Massachusetts; Massachusetts -- Politics and government -- 1775-1783
colonel of a regiment, senator in the Massachusetts Legislature, and one
of the founders of the Massachusetts General Hospital. He died in 1821.
All of Sir William's brothers were loyalists and were forced to leave
the country, and their vast domains passed into other hands. A life
interest or dower right in the Saco lands was enjoyed by Lady Mary
Pepperell, the widow of the first Sir William and her daughter, Mrs.
Sparhawk, which was devised to them by the Baronet's will. In exchange
for the right thus arising, the State afterwards assigned two-ninths in
absolute property to Lady Pepperell and her daughter, by a deed executed
in 1788. This small portion of this great estate was saved through these
ladies residing in the country during the war, the "sons of despotism"
could hardly tar and feather two defenceless women, or drive them forth
as they did their sons and brothers, and make absentees or refugees of
them.
Thus the princely fortune of Pepperell, that required a century to
construct, from the foundation laid by John Bray the shipwright to the
massive structure raised by the fisherman William Pepperell and
completed by his son Sir William, fastened and secured though it was, by
every instrument that his own skill and the best legal counsel could
devise to give stability and perpetuity, was in a brief hour overthrown,
and demolished by the confiscation act of 1778. So complete was the
wreck that two of his daughter's grandsons, were saved from the
almshouse by the bounty of some persons on whom they had no claim for
favor.
Never before in the history of this country has there been a more
conspicuous fall of a family from a high estate. There has always been a
doubt as to the legality of the Confiscation Act, as far as the
remainder or reversionary interest, of the first Sir William was
concerned, since it is apparently clear that the life-interest of the
second Sir William could only be, or by the statute actually was,
diverted and passed to the State.[168]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account