The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American RevolutionStark, James Henry
History
The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American Revolution
Stark, James Henry
American loyalists -- Massachusetts; Massachusetts -- Politics and government -- 1775-1783
Meanwhile the policy of breach of faith was producing its natural crop
of inconvenience. Dishonest methods were not the unmixed advantages
which these adherents had supposed, when they engaged upon them in a
spirit of light-hearted cunning. For in spite of all the ill-feeling, a
large demand arose for British goods. For these, specie had to be paid
down on the nail in all cases where wares or material were not taken in
exchange, since no British merchant would now give one pennyworth of
credit, out of respect to the measures of the various states for the
obstruction of the payment of British debts. It was true that Britain
was in no mood to embark upon a fresh war for the punishment of broken
promises. She had surrendered the chief hostage when she evacuated her
strategical position at New York, but she declined to hand over the
eight important frontier posts which she held upon the American side of
the line between Lake Michigan and Lake Champlain. These posts were much
in themselves, and as a symbol of dominion to the Indian tribes. They
were much also as a matter of pride, while their retention carried with
it the whole of the valuable fur trade, which consequently, until 1795,
when they were at last surrendered, brought considerable profits to
British merchants.
To the short-sighted policy which banished the Loyalists may be traced
nearly all the political troubles of this continent, in which Britain
and the United States have been involved. "Dearly enough have the people
of the United States paid for the crime of the violent Whigs of the
Revolution, for to the Loyalists who were driven away, and to their
descendants, we owe almost entirely the long and bitter controversy
relative to our northeastern boundaries, and the dispute about our right
to the fisheries in the colonial seas."
CHAPTER VI.
_THE REVOLUTIONIST._
The American Revolution, like most other revolutions, was the work of an
energetic minority who succeeded in committing an undecided and
fluctuating majority to courses for which they had little love; leading
them, step by step, to a position from which it was impossible to
recede. To the last, however, we find vacillation, uncertainty, half
measures, and, in large classes, a great apparent apathy. There was,
also, a great multitude, who, though they would never take up arms for
the king; though they, perhaps, agreed with the constitutional doctrines
of the revolution, dissented on grounds of principle, policy, or
interest, from the course they were adopting.
That the foregoing is a correct presentation of the case is shown by a
letter written by John Adams, when in Congress, to his wife. He says:
"I have found this congress like the last. When we first came together,
I found a strong jealousy of us from New England, and the Massachusetts
in particular--suspicions entertained of designs of independency, an
American republic, Presbyterian principles, and twenty other
things."[59]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account