The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American RevolutionStark, James Henry
History
The Loyalists of Massachusetts and the Other Side of the American Revolution
Stark, James Henry
American loyalists -- Massachusetts; Massachusetts -- Politics and government -- 1775-1783
There was a doubt in the minds of many people, which we have often heard
uttered in recent times, with reference to the French people in their
long series of revolutions, and equally so with the Spanish-American
republics with their almost annual revolutions, whether these words of
Winthrop were not correct, and that the people were really incapable of
self-government. It was a doubt which the revolution did not silence,
for the disturbing elements which had their issue in the Shay Rebellion,
The Whiskey Insurrection and the mutiny of the Pennsylvania Line, in
1781, were embers of a fire, smothered, not quenched, which rendered
state government insecure till it was welded into the Federal Union.
There was a widespread dislike to the levelling principles of New
England, to the arrogant, restless and ambitious policy of its
demagogues; to their manifest desire to invent or discover grievances,
foment quarrels and keep the wound open and festering.[63]
[63] See Adams' Works, Vol. II, pp. 350, 410.
Those who rebelled in good faith did so because they feared that the
power of Parliament to tax them moderately to raise money for their own
defence might be used sometime in the future for a less worthy purpose,
and then they would all be "slaves." Their argument led to mob rule and
anarchy, till the adaption of the Federal Constitution, after the close
of the Revolutionary War.
The opinion of such an authority as Lecky on our revolutionary movements
must be worthy of thoughtful attention; and his opinion is this: "Any
nation might be proud of the shrewd, brave, prosperous and highly
intelligent yeomen who flocked to the American camps; but they were very
different from those who defended the walls of Leyden, or immortalized
the field of Bannockburn. Few of the great pages of history are less
marked by the stamp of heroism than the American Revolution and perhaps
the most formidable of the difficulties which Washington had to
encounter were in his own camp."[64] And he concludes his survey of the
movement with these words: "In truth the American people, though in
general unbounded believers in progress, are accustomed, through a kind
of curious modesty, to do themselves a great injustice by the
extravagant manner in which they idealize their past. It has almost
become as commonplace that the great nation which in our own day has
shown such an admirable combination of courage, devotion and humanity in
its gigantic Civil War, and which since that time has so signally
falsified the prediction of its enemies and put to shame all the nations
of Europe by its unparalleled efforts in paying off its national debt,
is of far lower moral type than its ancestors at the time of the War of
Independence. This belief appears to me essentially false. The nobility
and beauty of Washington can, indeed, hardly be paralleled. Several of
the other leaders of the Revolution were men of ability and public
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account