The Lyon in Mourning, Vol. 1: or a collection of speeches, letters, journals, etc. relative to the affairs of Prince Charles Edward StuartForbes, Robert
History
The Lyon in Mourning, Vol. 1: or a collection of speeches, letters, journals, etc. relative to the affairs of Prince Charles Edward Stuart
Forbes, Robert
Charles Edward, Prince, grandson of James II, King of England, 1720-1788; Jacobite Rebellion, 1745-1746 -- Sources
Here Malcolm MacLeod informed me that he likewise gave a written
declaration, but did not subscribe it.
They both concurred in affirming the Ferguson behaved very roughly
and barbarously to them. When they were in health they and the other
prisoners were brought upon the quarter-deck betwixt 9 and 10 in the
morning, and were allowed to walk among two dozen or so of sheep
with sentries placed on each side of them. So long as Ferguson was
cruizing upon the Highland coast he took care to have great plenty
of fresh victuals of all sorts, the sweet fruits of plundering and
pillaging. The prisoners got only half-mans allowance in every
respect. For one day of the week they had pease; but the common
fellows of the ship behoved to be served first before the gentlemen
got any at all; and if the pease happened to fall short, the fellows
would have mixed them up with salt-water. The victuals were brought
to the prisoners in foul nasty buckets, wherein the fellows used
to piss for a piece of ill-natured diversion. They were assigned
their quarters in a dark place of the ship, where [Sidenote: _fol._
312.] they were not allowed the light of a candle of any kind, 'from
the 1st of August 1746 to the day,' said Donald and Malcolm, 'upon
which Lord Lovat suffered, being April 9th (Thursday) 1747. When
they were brought opposite to Tilbury Fort upon the Thames, they
were turned over from Ferguson to another [Sidenote: April] ship,
where they lay for months together in a most deplorable state of
misery, their cloaths wearing so off them that many at last had not
a single rag to cover their nakedness with. Here they were treated
with the utmost barbarity and cruelty, with a view (as they suppose)
to pine away their lives, and by piecemeal to destroy every single
man of them. And indeed the design had too great success, for many of
them died. Donald MacLeod said he had reason to think that no less
than four hundred men died on board three ships opposite to Tilbury
Fort,[143] among which sixty or seventy Grants of Glenmoriston, who
by the persuasion of the laird of Grant had surrendred themselves and
delivered up their arms at Inverness, when Cumberland was there not
long after the battle of Culloden. Donald and Malcolm declared that
finer and stouter men never drew a sword then what these Glenmoriston
men were; and none of them survived the miserable situation and
returned to their own country, but only one or two. They likewise
joined in laying great blame to the door of the Laird of Grant, who,
[Sidenote: _fol._ 313.] they said, could not fail to know what would
turn out to be the fate of those men if they should be prevailed
upon to surrender. In a word they looked upon him as the instrument
of the misery of these brave fellows, and spoke no good things of
him at all, affirming that he entertained a hatred at the Grants of
Glenmoriston.[144]
[143] See f. 1967.
[144] See ff. 1329, 1489, 1660.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account