Wirt Sikes, “British Goblins: Welsh Folk-Lore, Fairy Myths, Legends and Traditions,” London, 1880, p. 365. Footnote 75: Father Lambert, “Moeurs et Superstitions des Néo-Calédoniens,” Noumea, 1900, pp. 217, 218, 222, 292–304. Footnote 76: See Scott’s “Border Minstrelsy,” vol. iv, Pt. II, p. 645. Footnote 77: Lean’s Collectanea (by Vincent Stuckey Lean), vol. ii, Pt. I, Bristol, 1903, p. 476; see W. F. Wademan in Jour. Roy. Hist, and Arch. Assoc. of Ireland, July, 1875. Footnote 78: Catalogue of the collection of pearls and precious stones formed by Henry Philip Hope, Esq. Systematically arranged and described by B. Hertz, London, 1830. Footnote 79: Op. cit., p. 106. Footnote 80: Op. cit., No. 66, p. 106. Footnote 81: Op. cit., No. 65, p. 106. Footnote 82: Valentini, “Museum Museorum, oder der Vollständige Schau-Bühne,” Franckfurt am Mayn, 1713, Pt. II, p. 41; figured. Footnote 83: Ulyssis Aldrovandi, “Museum metallicum,” Bononiæ, 1648, p. 527; figured on p. 528. Footnote 84: Valentini, “Museum Museorum,” p. 42; citing description by Major in his “Tractatus de cancris et lapidibus petrifactis,” p. 64. Footnote 85: Ibid., p. 42; Pl. IX, fig. 3. Footnote 86: Ibid., p. 41; figured. From report in Miscellan. Acad. Germ. Cur., Decur. I, Ann. I, Obs. CXIII, p. 232. Footnote 87: Athanasii Kircheri, “Mundus subterraneus,” Amstelodami, 1665, vol. ii, pp. 42 sqq. Footnote 88: Op. cit., vol. i, p. 39; Pl. IV, fig. 6. Footnote 89: Scribner & Co., 1886. Footnote 90: The Germans called it Aschenzieher. Footnote 91: Pliny, “Naturalia historia,” Lib. xxxvii, cap. 29. In his recently published “Curious Lore of Precious Stones” the present writer suggested that Pliny’s _lychnis_ might have been a spinel, but while some of these “ardent stones” may have been spinels, those displaying the phenomenon of attraction must have been tourmalines. Footnote 92: A. C. Hamlin. Footnote 93: Theophrasti, “De lapidibus, peri tôn lithôn,” ed. by John Hill, London, 1746, pp. 71–73 (cap. xlvi). Footnote 94: Idem, pp. 68–71 (cap. xlvi); see also Hill’s note on p. 69. Footnote 95: Johannis de Laet, Antwerpii, “De gemmis et lapidibus, libri duo,” Lugduni Batavorum [1647], pp. 36, 40. Footnote 96: “_Curiose Speculationes_ bey schlaflosen Nächten ... von einem _L_iebhaber der _I_mmer _G_ern _S_peculirt,” Chemnitz und Leipzig, bey Conr. Stosseln, 1707, 857, pp. 80. Footnote 97: Johann Gustav Donndorf, “Natur und Kunst,” Leipzig, 1790, p. 516. Footnote 98: “Histoire de l’Académie Royale des Sciences et Belles Lettres,” vol. xii, 1756; Berlin, 1758, pp. 105–121. Footnote 99: See Historie de l’Académie Royale des Sciences Année mdcccxvii Paris, 1719, pp. 7, 8. Footnote 100: Abbé Haüy, “Trattato dei caratteri fisici delle pietre preziose,” Ital. trans. by Luigi Configliachi, Milano, 1819, pp. 135–138; see Plate II, fig. 49. Footnote 101: