The Makers of Modern Rome, in Four BooksOliphant, Mrs. (Margaret)
History
The Makers of Modern Rome, in Four Books
Oliphant, Mrs. (Margaret)
Rome (Italy) -- History -- 476-1420
The pleas in favour of Otho are much weaker. It is true, the Pope
admits, that he had been elected by a minority, but then the number of
notable and important electors were as great on his side as on
Philip's: his house had a purer record than that of Philip: and
finally he was weaker than Philip and more in need of support;
therefore the Holy See threw all its influence upon his side. Nothing
could be feebler than this conclusion after the force of the hostile
judgments. We fear it must be allowed that Innocent being merely a man
(which is the one unsurmountable argument against papal infallibility)
went the way his prepossessions and inclinations--and also, we have no
doubt, his conviction of what was best--led him, and was no more
certain to be right in doing so than any other man.
Having come to this conclusion, Innocent took his stand with all the
power and influence he possessed upon Otho's side--a support which
probably kept that prince afloat and made the long struggle possible,
but was quite inadequate to set him effectually on the throne, or
injure his rival in any serious way. In this partisan warfare,
excommunication was the readiest of weapons; but excommunications, as
we have already said, were very ineffectual in the greater number of
cases; for Germany especially was full of great prelates as great as
the princes, in most cases of as high race and as much territorial
power, and they by no means always agreed with the Pope, and made no
pretence of obeying him; and how was the people to find out that they
lay under anathema when they saw the offices of the Church carried on
with all the splendour of the highest ritual, its services unbroken,
however the Pope might thunder behind? Some of these prelates--such as
Leopold of Mainz, appointed by the Emperor, to whom Innocent refused
his sanction, electing on his own part another archbishop, Siegfried,
in his stead, who was not for many years permitted even to enter the
diocese of which he was the titular head--maintained with Rome a
struggle as obstinate as any secular prince. They were as powerful as
the princes among whom they sat and reigned, and elected emperors.
Most of the German bishops, we are told, were on Philip's side
notwithstanding the decision of the Pope against him. In such
circumstances the anathema was little more than a farce. The
Archbishop of Mainz was excommunicated as much as the emperor, but
being all the same in full possession of his see and its privileges,
naturally acted as though nothing had happened, and found plenty of
clergy to support him, who carried on the services of the Church as
usual and administered the sacraments to Philip as much as if he had
been in the full sunshine of Papal favour.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account