England -- Social life and customs -- 20th century -- Fiction; English fiction -- 20th century; Journalists -- Fiction
“There’ve been plenty died since those,” he remarked. “Those whom the
gods love, etcetera. But lots have lived, too. If you come to that, look
at the _Times_, the _Spectator_, and the _Daily Mirror_. They were new
once. So was the _English Review_; so was _Poetry and Drama_; so was the
_New Statesman_; so was the _Blue Review_. They’re alive yet. Then why
not _Unity_? Even if it has a short life, it may be a merry one.”
“To heal divisions,” mused the Dean. “A good aim, of course. Though
probably a hopeless one. One makes it one’s task, you know, to throw
bridges, as far as one can, between the Church and the agnostics, and
the Church and dissent. And look at the result. A friendly act of
conciliation on the part of one of our bishops calls forth torrents of
bitter abuse in the columns of our Church papers. The High Church party
is so unmanageable: it’s stiff: it stands out for differences: it won’t
be brought in. How can we ever progress towards unity if the extreme
left remains in that state of wilful obscurantism and unchristian
intolerance?... Of course, mind, there are limits; one would fight very
strongly against disestablishment or disendowment; but the ritualists
seem to be out for quarrels over trifles.” He added, because Eddy had
worked in St. Gregory’s, “Of course, individually, there are numberless
excellent High Churchmen; one doesn’t want to run down their work. But
they’ll never stand for unity.”
“Quite,” said Eddy, meditating on unity. “That’s exactly what Finch and
the rest say about the Broad Church party, you know. And it’s what
dissenters say about Church people, and Church people about dissenters.
The fact is, so few parties do stand for unity. They nearly all stand
for faction.”
“I don’t think we Broad Churchmen stand for faction,” said the Dean, and
Eddy replied that nor did the High Churchmen think they did, nor
dissenters either. They all thought they were aiming at unity, but it
was the sort of unity attained by the survivor of the _Nancy_ brig, or
the tiger of Riga, that was the ideal of most parties; it was doubtless
also the ideal of a boa-constrictor. Mrs. Oliver, who had come into the
room and wasn’t sure it was in good taste to introduce light verse and
boa-constrictors into religious discussions, said, “You seem to be
talking a great deal of nonsense, dear boy. Everard, have you had your
drops yet?”
In such fruitful family discourse they wiled away the Dean’s
convalescence.
Meanwhile Molly, jolly and young and alive, with her brown hair curling
in the sun, and her happy infectious laugh and her bright, eager, amber
eyes full of friendly mirth, was a sheer joy. If she too “stood for”
anything beyond herself, it was for youth and mirth and jollity and
country life in the open; all sweet things. Eddy and she liked each
other rather more each day. They made a plan for Molly to spend a month
or so in the autumn with her aunt that lived in Hyde Park Terrace, so
that she and Eddy should be near each other.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account