England -- Social life and customs -- 20th century -- Fiction; English fiction -- 20th century; Journalists -- Fiction
“Nonsense,” said Eddy. “Mr. Datcherd would be delighted. Mr. Traherne’s
a first-rate lecturer, you know; they learn more from him than they do
from all the Socialist literature they get out of the library.”
Worse than this, several young men who despised church-going, quite
suddenly took to it, bicycling over to the Borough to hear the Reverend
Traherne preach. Datcherd had no objection to anyone going to church if
from conviction, but this sort of unbalanced, unreasoning yielding to a
personal influence he would certainly consider degrading and unworthy of
a thinking citizen. Be a man’s convictions what they might, Datcherd
held, let them _be_ convictions, based on reason and principle, not
incoherent impulses and chance emotions. It was almost certain that he
would not have approved of Traherne’s influence over his clubs.
Still less, Pollard thought, would he have approved of Captain
Greville’s. Captain Greville was a retired captain, who needs no
description here. His mission in life was to talk about the National
Service League. Eddy, who, it may be remembered, belonged among other
leagues to this, met him somewhere, and requested him to come and
address the club on the subject one evening. He did so. He made a very
good speech, for thirty-five minutes, which is exactly the right length
for this topic. (Some people err, and speak too long, on this as on many
other subjects, and miss their goal in consequence.) Captain Greville
said, How delightful to strengthen the national fibre and the sense of
civic duty by bringing all men into relation with national ideas through
personal training during youth; to strengthen the national health by
sound physical development and discipline, etcetera; to bring to bear
upon the most important business with which a nation can have to deal,
namely, National Defence, the knowledge, the interest, and the criticism
of the national mind; to safeguard the nation against war by showing
that we are prepared for it, and ensure that, should war break out,
peace may be speedily re-established; in short, to Organize our Man
Power; further, not to be shot in time of invasion for carrying a gun
unlawfully, which is a frequent incident (sensation). He said a good
deal more, which need not be specified, as it is doubtless familiar to
many, and would be unwelcome to others. At the end he said, “Are you
Democrats? Then join the League, which advocates the only democratic
system of defence. Are you Socialists?” (this was generous, because he
disliked Socialists very much) “Then join the League, which aims at a
reform strictly in accordance with the principles of co-operative
socialism; in fact, many people base their opposition to it on the
grounds that it is too socialistic. Finally (he observed), what we want
is not a standing army, and not a war--God forbid--but men capable of
fighting _like_ men in defence of their wives, their children, and their
homes.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account