“If,” writes Wallace, on page 217 of _Darwinism_, “we consider the habits
and life-histories of those animals which are more or less gregarious,
comprising a large proportion of the herbivora, some carnivora, and a
considerable number of all orders of birds, we shall see that a means of
ready recognition of its own kind, at a distance or during rapid motion,
in the dusk of twilight or in partial cover, must be of the greatest
advantage and often lead to the preservation of life. Animals of this
kind will not usually receive a stranger in their midst. While they keep
together they are generally safe from attack, but a solitary straggler
becomes an easy prey to the enemy; it is therefore of the highest
importance that, in such a case, the wanderer should have every facility
for discovering its companions with certainty at any distance within the
range of vision.
“Some means of easy recognition must be of vital importance to the young
and inexperienced of each flock, and it also enables the sexes to
recognise their kind and thus avoid the evils of infertile crosses; and I
am inclined to believe that its necessity has had a more widespread
influence in determining the diversities of animal colouration than any
other cause whatever. To it may probably be imputed the singular fact
that whereas bilateral symmetry of colouration is very frequently lost
among domesticated animals, it almost universally prevails in a state of
nature; for if the two sides of an animal were unlike, and the diversity
of colouration among domestic animals occurred in a wild state, easy
recognition would be impossible among numerous closely allied forms.”
As examples of recognition colouration, Wallace cites, among others, the
white upturned tail of the rabbit—a “signal flag of danger,” the
conspicuous white patch displayed by many antelopes, the white marks on
the wing- and tail-feathers of the British species of butcher-birds, the
stone-chat, the whin-chat, and the wheat-ear.
Wallace therefore asserts, firstly, that recognition marks not only help
herbivorous animals to keep together, but act as a danger signal; the
member of a flock which first catches sight of the enemy takes to its
heels, displaying its white flag, which is the signal of danger to the
other members of the flock. Secondly, that recognition marks prevent the
evils of infertile crosses. Thirdly, that the necessity of being able to
recognise one another has rigidly preserved bilateral symmetry among
animals in a state of nature.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account