To place on the stigma pollen from the anthers of the same flower, in case of a plant which for many generations has been cross-fertilised, is to subject the plant in question to a novel experience—an experience which may be compared to transplanting it to another soil. The immediate effect may appear to be unfavourable, although, if the experiment be persisted in, the ultimate results may prove beneficial to the plant. That this is the case with some flowers that are artificially fertilised is asserted by the Rev. G. Henslow. This observer states, that had Darwin pursued his investigations further, he would probably have modified his views regarding the benefits of self-fertilisation. Darwin’s statement that “Nature abhors perpetual self-fertilisation” seems to be as far from the truth as that which declares “Nature abhors a vacuum.” From the mere fact that cross-fertilised flowers yield a greater quantity of seed than they do when self-fertilised, it does not necessarily follow that cross-fertilisation is advantageous. The amount of seed produced is probably not always a criterion as to the advantages of the crossing to the plant. Some flowers yield most seed when fertilised by the pollen from flowers belonging to a different species! It is significant that some plants produce cleistogamous flowers, that is to say, flowers which invariably fertilise themselves. Such flowers never open; so that the visits of insects are precluded. According to Bentham, the Pansy (_Viola tricolor_) is the only British species of _Viola_ in which the showy flowers produce seeds. The other species are all propagated by their cleistogamous flowers. The genus _Viola_ is an advanced species: it would therefore seem that the production of cleistogamous flowers is an advance on the production of entomophilous flowers. Cleistogamous blossoms are obviously more economical. Insects and Flowers In the case of the malvas, epilobias and geraniums, where we see, side by side, races of which the individuals produce insect-fertilised flowers and those that are characterised by self-fertilised flowers, the latter are quite as thriving as the former. The common groundsel, which, according to Lord Avebury, is “rarely visited by insects,” flourishes like the green bay tree, as many gardeners know to their cost. The same may be said of the pimpernels. In this connection it is important to bear in mind that the anemophilous, or wind-fertilised, angiosperms, as, for example, the grasses, are believed to be descendants of insect-fertilised or entomophilous forms. A weighty objection to the theory that the colours of flowers have been developed because they attract insects has been urged by Mr E. Kay Robinson, namely, that among wild flowers the most highly coloured ones are the least attractive to insects.