The Making of the Great West, 1512-1883Drake, Samuel Adams
History
The Making of the Great West, 1512-1883
Drake, Samuel Adams
America -- Discovery and exploration; West (U.S.) -- History
Emigration poured in from the Lower Mississippi Valley,—from Louisiana,
Arkansas, and Mississippi,—and even the older States contributed to
swell the tide. The law forbade slavery, but many brought negroes with
them and held them in spite of it. Many were adventurers who held law
in little estimation, or found in Texas a convenient asylum from the
pursuit of their creditors. Others were poor people whom the liberal
offers of the Mexican Government lured from their homes in the hope of
bettering their condition. Though sound at the heart, in no long time
Texas had won for itself an unenviable name throughout the Union as the
chosen home of lawless men, through its worst elements rising to the
top.
Our Government had long coveted Texas, and had made two unsuccessful
attempts to buy it of Mexico, considering it as an integral part of Old
Louisiana, to which we had a sort of right by the prior discovery of La
Salle.
Texas, which the Spaniards had weakly settled and feebly governed,
declared herself independent of Mexico in 1835. When this revolt took
place there were more Americans than people of Spanish blood in Texas,
so bringing over to the Texan cause the warm sympathy and active aid of
a large part of the American people.
The conflict was short and bloody. After meeting reverses at Goliad
and the Alamo,[2] the Texans won their independence by defeating the
Mexican army at San Jacinto,[3] in 1836. General Samuel Houston, the
Texan leader, was subsequently made president of the Republic of Texas,
which then set up for itself upon the model of the United States.
In no long time Texas applied for admission to the Union. Too weak to
maintain herself as an independent power, her interests were now at one
with the South. Her soil, climate, and productions were much the same.
Her population was largely derived from that source, and owned to like
feelings and prejudices with their brethren of that section. The South,
therefore, favored the admission of Texas, not only for these general
reasons, but because it would add a slave State to the Union, as, since
Missouri and Arkansas had come in, there was no more territory, except
Florida, open to slavery under the interdicted line of 36° 30´.
[Illustration: THE ALAMO.]
For this very reason the growing anti-slavery sentiment of the North
strongly opposed the admission of Texas. It was further opposed on
the ground that as Mexico had not yet acknowledged the independence of
Texas, so unfriendly an act toward Mexico would lead to war. Moreover,
Texas was of such vast extent, compared with other States, that the bill
for its admission allowed the making of four more new States out of it,
so opening the door of the Union not to one, but several slave States
in the future.
[Illustration: SAMUEL HOUSTON.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account