The Making of the Great West, 1512-1883Drake, Samuel Adams
History
The Making of the Great West, 1512-1883
Drake, Samuel Adams
America -- Discovery and exploration; West (U.S.) -- History
Among the free-State men were some who believed such acts as had been
committed at Lawrence called for reprisals in kind. Of these, James
H. Lane[4] obtained a wide notoriety; but the animating spirit was
undoubtedly John Brown of Osawatomie,[5] who held that the policy
of submission was all wrong, and that the pro-slavery men too must
be made to fear for their own safety before peace could be had. He
avowed himself in favor of giving blow for blow. This idea found much
favor with the fighting portion of the free-State men. On the question
of slavery, Brown's mind was surely unsettled by the all-engrossing
idea that slavery was a thing of violence which must die a violent
death. To bring this about was now the one purpose of his life, and
in pursuit of it he was as inexorable as fate. For its accomplishment
he possessed certain qualities that make either the hero or martyr
according as the purpose is weighed by history. An iron will, religious
fervor amounting to fanaticism, were joined to a calm but resolute
courage which no danger could daunt or turn from its purpose. He was
a seventeenth-century Puritan of the Cromwellian stamp—a man of iron
belonging to an iron age.
Brown soon had the border in terror of his deeds. The blows he struck
were swift, secret and deadly. It was now the pro-slavery men who were
driven out or assassinated, or had their homes fired at dead of night.
Men sent to take him were themselves taken and held as prisoners. These
acts led to retaliation, retaliation to fresh outrages, and for a time
Kansas was given over to violence.
[Illustration: BROWN'S LOG HOUSE.]
Believing Congress would admit them to the Union, the slavery party
also formed a State Constitution at Lecompton, the capital. But an
election for a new legislature had overwhelmingly defeated them, thus
giving control of the Territorial body to the free-State men at last.
So the Lecompton men now saw no hope for themselves except in their
State Constitution. As they refused to submit the whole instrument to
the people, the free-State men refrained from voting for or against
the single proposition of "slavery" or "no slavery," seeing they must
get the detested Constitution in any event. The returns showed the old
determination still strong to fasten slavery on the people against
their will. A large majority was obtained for the Constitution by
stuffing the ballot-boxes with fraudulent votes. Of six thousand and odd
votes (6,226), nearly half (2,720) were illegally cast. The Lecompton
Constitution was, however, sent to Congress by President Buchanan with
his approval. In Congress it provoked a stormy debate, was sent back
to the people of Kansas for final ratification, and by them decisively
rejected at the polls, August, 1858.
Though Kansas was kept out of the Union three years longer, her attitude
in respect to slavery was now so little doubtful that the pro-slavery
men gave up the contest in despair.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account