The Man-at-Arms; or, Henry De Cerons. Volumes I and IIJames, G. P. R. (George Payne Rainsford)
General
The Man-at-Arms; or, Henry De Cerons. Volumes I and II
James, G. P. R. (George Payne Rainsford)
Huguenots -- Fiction
The scene of confusion that ensued, explanations, histories,
inquiries, replies, fresh mistakes, and fresh _eclaircissements_,
though they were all comprised in the space of about an hour, would
occupy a great many hours in the detail. At the end of that time,
there were only two things which wanted explanation; the first of
which was, what had become of two letters, one of which William
Stanhope had sent from St. Helena on his way to India, telling that he
had been shipwrecked; that when his vessel went down he had been saved
in the last boat, and had been picked up by an outward-bound Indiaman;
that he had preserved the bills in which all his little capital was
invested; and that he intended to employ them in India, in the hope of
recovering, in some degree, the terrible loss he had sustained. The
second letter had been written from London three days before his
reappearance; and went to inform Mr. Deer that the loss of his vessel
had proved, as far as he was concerned, the most fortunate chance that
could have befallen him; that he had arrived in India at a happy
moment; had made one of those successful speculations which were then
not uncommon, and which the good name he had acquired while a mate in
the service had now enabled him to extend far more than his own
limited capital would have permitted; that, contented with one happy
chance and a moderate fortune, he had returned to England, and was
coming down to claim the hand of his fair bride, a far richer man than
his most sanguine hopes had ever led him to anticipate. The loss of
the first of these letters William himself easily accounted for, by
acknowledging that he had intrusted it to a private hand; and every
one who has had anything to do with private hands must be well aware
that they are in general furnished with very slippery fingers. The
loss of the second was justly accounted for by a surmise of Mr. John
Pocock's, who suggested that, as postmasters--whether legally or not
we do not know--take upon themselves the infamous task of handing over
the letters of bankrupts, public and private alike, to the assignees;
exposing to the cold eyes of mercantile inquisitors all the secrets of
domestic life; the anguish of the child's heart for the parent's
misfortune; the agony of the parent for the downfall of his child; the
sweet communings and consolings of kindred affection; the counsel and
the comfort, the care and the apprehension--as this evil and
iniquitous practice, we say, is or was tolerated in the land, Mr.
Pocock suggested that the letter of William Stanhope had very likely
been sent to the assignees. And so it was. The letter had been so
sent. The assignees were absent. And thus, for three long days, the
letter was withheld from the only eye that should have seen it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account