The man in the street: Papers on American topicsNicholson, Meredith
General
The man in the street: Papers on American topics
Nicholson, Meredith
American essays -- 20th century
It is true of a period still susceptible of intimate scrutiny--say,
from the Civil War--that presidential candidates have been chosen
in every case from a small group of potentialities in both parties.
We have established (stupidly in any large view of the matter)
geographical limitations upon the possible choice that greatly narrow
the field. Candidates for the presidency must be chosen with an eye to
the local effect, from States essential to success. Though Mr. Blaine’s
candidacy was surrounded by unusual circumstances, it emphasizes,
nevertheless, the importance to the parties of nominating men from the
“pivotal” States. We have had no New England President since Franklin
Pierce. This is not because the New England States have not produced
men of fitness, but is attributable solely to the small representation
of the Northeastern States in the Electoral College.
The South, likewise, has long been eliminated from the reckoning.
Though born in Virginia Mr. Wilson is distinctly not “a Southern man”
in the familiar connotations of that term. In old times the Southern
States contributed men of the first rank to both houses of Congress;
but, apart from Mr. Underwood (who received one hundred and seventeen
and one-half votes at Baltimore) and Mr. John Sharp Williams, there are
no Southerners of conspicuous attainments in the present Senate. The
Southern bar embraces now, perhaps as truly as at any earlier period,
lawyers of distinguished ability, but they apparently do not find
public life attractive.
No President has yet been elected from beyond the Mississippi, though
Mr. Bryan, thrice a candidate, widened the area of choice westward.
In the present year Governor Johnson and Senator Borah were the only
trans-Mississippi men mentioned as possibilities, and they cut no
figure in the contest. We are still a congeries of States, or groups of
States, rather than a nation, with a resulting political provincialism
that is disheartening when we consider the economic and political power
we wield increasingly in world affairs.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account