When am I to address you as "Sir Bennet"?—as it ought to be, if I dare express my thoughts. We look in each Honours’ list expecting it. Spencer is quite bitter on the subject, but I tell him "comparisons are odious." At any rate I won’t repeat his indiscretions. We are all wondering here when Sir James Eccles is returning. I have not yet had the privilege of seeing him and can only take Spencer’s opinions for guide. In Spencer’s mind he is well-nigh irreplaceable. Spencer feels it would be little less than disastrous to place the control of Ungujan affairs in the hands of any younger or less experienced man. With Sir James Eccles the Germans will try no nonsense. They might even renounce their protectorate in despair if he were to return and had the influence of his Government behind him. Whereas with a weaker man, or even with one of no authority, merely an "acting" Consul-General, they may go to _any_ lengths. I am foolish enough about my Husband to think—if there _must_ be a stop-gap—that he would be better than—well, than the present Acting Consul-General. Spencer thoroughly distrusts the Germans and refuses even to learn their ugly language; whereas C-p-n B. is much too friendly with them and has gone to the length of saying we must not play the dog in the manger over Africa. It seems there have been great German African explorers as well as English, and Spencer’s colleague thinks it rather hard they should not have colonies as well as we. Not knowing your own views I hesitate to express mine. And I should not be so presumptuous as to ask for any guidance or any answer even to this letter. I dare say if you think Spencer is to have more responsibility and initiative in the future you will privately instruct him as to the policy of your department.