However, Fouquet was not so detached from things terrestrial as not
to interest himself in them at all. His mother, wife and several
children, being still alive, his thoughts often turned towards these
dearly beloved beings, and also, but without bitterness, towards
Louis XIV. and his conquests, towards the Court and the Ministers.
He often questioned Saint-Mars. The latter’s replies were brief, and
so unprecise that he considered himself obliged to write to Louvois
and inquire in what sense he ought to answer.[407] Entirely master of
his prisoner, sure of those who surrounded him, he believed that the
barrier which he had erected around him was insuperable, and thought
that he would be able to keep him apprised of contemporary events as
he pleased, or else leave him in the most complete ignorance. Useless
efforts and vain confidence in his power! The enterprising audacity and
industrious perseverance of a prisoner recently brought to Pignerol,
triumphed over even the innumerable precautions of the most suspicious
of gaolers.
FOOTNOTES:
[384] _Mémoires de Choisy_, p. 590.
[385] M. Feuillet de Conches, _Causeries d’un Curieux_, vol. ii. p.
529. “M. d’Artagnan told me,” says Olivier d’Ormesson in his _Journal_,
“that M. Fouquet, during the first three weeks, was very unquiet
and amazed, but that his mind grew calmer, and that he became very
self-possessed afterwards, giving himself up largely to devotion; that
he fasted every week on Wednesday and Friday, and besides this, lived
on Saturday on bread and water; that he rose before seven o’clock,
said his prayers, and after that worked till nine o’clock; that he
subsequently heard mass.”--_Journal d’Olivier d’Ormesson_, vol. ii. p.
52.
[386] Letters from Louvois to Saint-Mars, June 29, 1665, and from
Colbert to the same, on the same day. People at Paris as well as at
Pignerol did not fail to say that heaven had judged him innocent whom
men had condemned. See _Lettres de Madame de Sévigné et de Guy Patin_;
_Journal d’Olivier d’Ormesson_, vol. ii. p. 372; _Œuvres de Fouquet_,
vol. xvi.
[387] Order of Louis XIV., countersigned by Le Tellier, and dated from
Saint-Germain, June 29, 1665. It was Saint-Mars who, with his free
company as escort, took Fouquet to La Pérouse, and continued to guard
him there till the month of August, 1666, at which period he brought
him back to Pignerol.
[388] Delort, _Histoire de la Détention des Philosophes_, vol. i. p.
103.
[389] Letters from Louvois to Saint-Mars, July 26 and December 18, 1665.
[390] Louvois inquired in vain as to the manner in which Fouquet had
been able to compound this sympathetic ink. “It is necessary,” he wrote
to Saint-Mars on July 26, 1665, “that you should endeavour to find out
from Monsieur de Fouquet’s servant how [his master] has written the
four lines which appeared upon the book on warming it, and of what he
has composed this writing.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account