Beaufort was not the least assiduous in giving satisfaction to the
absolute monarch. Little formed for command, for which an extreme
impetuosity rendered him unsuited, he received very humbly the
severe reprimands of Louis XIV. and Colbert, and supported the yoke
of the master as docilely as he was harsh and imperious to his own
officers.[182] If he was always menacing the latter with ill-treatment
and with having them thrown into the sea, he submitted, in his naval
expeditions, to the control and almost to the rule of the Intendant
placed at his side by Colbert.[183] Nothing in him, then, was
dangerous to the court: neither his character, for his subordinates
alone experienced its violence; nor his talents, which were almost
nugatory; nor his pretensions, which had become very much reduced;
nor his popularity, which scarcely extended beyond the boundaries of
his kingdom of the _halles_. More than that, he had, in the eyes of
the King, the merit of belonging, through his father,[184] to those
illegitimate princes whom Louis XIV. was constantly to favour--at
first from political interest, with the view of opposing them to the
legitimate heirs of the great families; then from paternal affection,
when his own _amours_ had quickly increased their number--and to whom,
from a pride more and more immoderate, he was to accord successively
precedence over the peers, then the rank of royal princes, and, lastly,
to the shame of the whole kingdom, rights to the throne of France. One
cannot understand, then, for what motive Louis XIV. would have sought
to have got rid of a prince too unimportant to excite his jealousy, too
submissive for a revolt to be feared from him, and who, the son of a
bastard, was preparing for and justifying by his example the early and
more and more scandalous elevation of the illegitimate offspring of the
great King.
Previous to the expedition to Candia, whither, according to
Lagrange-Chancel, and those who share his opinion,[185] Beaufort was
sent in order that he might be carried off and afterwards condemned
to perpetual imprisonment, was there any act in the Admiral’s naval
career, by which he had entered into a state of rebellion against the
court? Was there anything of the kind in the expedition of 1664, when,
in spite of the opinions of his lieutenants, some of whom wished
to attack Bona first, others Boujeiah,[186] Beaufort, adhering too
strictly to Louis XIV.’s detailed instructions, directed an attack on
Gigery, of which he possessed himself prematurely, and compromised
the results of the campaign by a scrupulous obedience to orders given
at a distance, and which he ought to have been bold enough to have
disregarded? Was there anything in 1666, when he was charged to command
the escort of the new Queen of Portugal,[187] and when, in spite of
his ardour and of a noble desire to hasten to an encounter with the
English, he agreed, so as to obey orders, to remain immovable in the
waters of the Tagus?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account