She was humiliated publicly, and, as she saw it, the one course open to
her was to make Sam suffer a humiliation as drastic and as public as her
own. Though it hurt her, he must pay for it; though she died, he must
be punished and, sincerely, she expected it to kill her. She lived in a
garden of lies, and life without the illusion of her marriage would be
as impossible as life without the fragrance of her poisonous flowers to
Rappaccini’s daughter, but no matter for that. Ada must be revenged,
and divorce, though it killed her, would be the greatest injury that she
could do a politician and a pietistic publisher. She managed to square
the circle, too. She was to die and make a murderer of him; she was to
ruin his business and make a bankrupt of him; and at the same time
she was to have the compensation of a handsome alimony. But perhaps
vengeance is always irrational, and that is why it belongs to God.
She dinned her word into Peter’s ears with the merciless reiteration
of a hurt and howling child. It was her first word and her last, and
appeals based on religion shattered themselves against it as fruitlessly
as the appeal to reason. What she had said she had said: and she had
said “Divorce.” Alternatives did not exist.
For Peter, divorce ranged itself with the abominations of the world,
a man-made legal subterfuge to evade the law of God. There might,
conceivably, be occasions when divorce was to be condoned as the
comparatively little wrong which did a great right, and he tried very
honestly to see Ada’s as one of those heroic needs. He failed: he could
not even see that Ada was hurt in soul, or in anything but pride. She
was in a mood, not of spiritual revolt, but of peevish discontent.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account