One calls Verity an honest Conservative because he made no concessions,
not because he was himself a fount of honour. He had no sympathy with
the modern mawkishness about pampering the people. He admitted that one
had to make promises, that the way to win elections was to tickle the
elector as if he were a trout, but as an Alderman he sat above the
cockpit of electioneering and frowned upon the Liberal attitudes to
which younger Conservatives descended to catch a vote. And their view
that the Council existed for the people honestly revolted him: it was so
patently the other way about.
The particular instance was Baths in Hulme. He saw no sense in Baths in
Hulme. He was quite sincere in his belief that to build Baths in Hulme
was to cast pearls before swine. Hulme had not asked for Baths and did
not want Baths. Baths were opportunities for cleanliness and Hulme did
not want to be clean. Hulme would not be Hulme if it were clean.
The uncleanliness of Hulme was an institution. Conservatives conserve
institutions, and the only thing which could remove his Conservative and
Aldermanic objection to Baths in Hulme was self-interest.
Self-interest is the greatest institution of them all.
He continued to oppose the young bloods of his Party because for a long
time he did not see where his self-interest came in. He even opposed
them publicly. He said in public that Baths in Hulme were a nasty,
pandering, Liberal idea and that no decent-minded Conservative could
think of it without nausea. And then, suddenly and silently, he was
found to be with those who proposed that Hulme should bathe if it wanted
to. His change of mind coincided with the discovery that there was no
open space in Hulme where Baths could be erected. Something would have
to come down that the Baths might go up, and what would come down, and
why, was the secret of Mr. Alderman Verity and one or two others of
the Old Gang who had the habit of standing loyally by each other when a
little simple jobbery was in question. Really, it was too simple to
be reprehensible. If a Town Council can by one and the same resolution
clear away a slum, and confer Baths, who benefits, and doubly, but the
Town? Naturally, the slum owner has to be compensated, though adequate
compensation can hardly be put high enough. Slums are so profitable.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account