The Marquis D'Argenson: A Study in Criticism: Being the Stanhope Essay: Oxford, 1893Ogle, Arthur
History
The Marquis D'Argenson: A Study in Criticism: Being the Stanhope Essay: Oxford, 1893
Ogle, Arthur
Argenson, René-Louis de Voyer, marquis d', 1694-1757
[Footnote 207: In the Bibliothèque de l'Arsenal (MS. 6141, fol. 295)
there exists a "Counsel's opinion" obtained by Mme. d'Argenson, signed
"De Lambon," and dated September 28, 1756. It throws much light upon
Madame d'Argenson's character, and confirms her husband's estimate of
her. After twenty-two years she had not forgiven; and feeling it an
indignity to be dependent upon her husband for the handsome allowance
he had consented to make her, she proposed to have the separation, both
of person and property, judicially confirmed. Her counsel evidently
thought her claim unwarrantable, and in some of his most moderate words
he says: "But to-day, after more than twenty-two years that they have
lived apart, and after the legal arrangements made by Madame d'Argenson
with her husband in January, 1733, and October, 1747 (le ... ? janvier,
1733, et le ? octobre, 1747), her desire would not be countenanced for
a moment. She would not be permitted to revive the old facts, and to
form a demand for a (judicial) separation, so long as M. d'Argenson
adheres faithfully to that concluded by agreement." The document closes
with the crushing words: "Il vaut mieux se condamner soimême, que de
plaider pour être condamné."]
[Footnote 208: Journal (Rathery), I. p. 215.]
[Footnote 209: Journal (Rathery), I. p. 219.]
[Footnote 210: Ibid., September 3, and November 13 and 26, 1736.]
[Footnote 211: Ibid., I. p. 228.]
[Footnote 212: See Journal (Rathery), III. p. 13, and De Tocqueville,
"Histoire Philosophique du règne de Louis XV.," I. p. 416.]
[Footnote 213: Journal (Rathery), I. p. 235.]
[Footnote 214: Ibid., I. p. 237.]
[Footnote 215: Ibid., I. p. 238.]
[Footnote 216: Ibid., I. p. 242.]
[Footnote 217: D'Argenson had held the same post in the beginning of
his career (see pp. 28, 30). It was not important, but it presented
opportunities which Count d'Argenson was astute enough to turn to
account. He held it in conjunction with the chancellorship of the
Orléans household, which had been given him by the Regent in 1723, and
which he retained after his dismissal from the Lieutenancy of Police in
January, 1724. See p. 46.]
[Footnote 218: Journal (Rathery), I. p. 246.]
[Footnote 219: Ibid., I. p. 260.]
[Footnote 220: Ibid., I. p. 262.]
[Footnote 221: Ibid., I. p. 263.]
[Footnote 222: Ibid., I. p. 262.]
[Footnote 223: Ste. Beuve, "Causeries du lundi," XII. and XIV.]
[Footnote 224: Journal (Rathery), I. pp. 240-41.]
[Footnote 225: Ibid., I. p. 260.]
[Footnote 226: At this time Portugal, completely dominated by English
influence, was a thorn in the side of the Bourbon powers. _Cf._
"Considérations," p. 89 (1764) and p. 78 (1784).]
[Footnote 227: Journal (Rathery), I. p. 264.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account