The Martins Of Cro' Martin, Vol. I (of II)Lever, Charles
History
The Martins Of Cro' Martin, Vol. I (of II)
Lever, Charles
Ireland -- History -- 1800-1837 -- Fiction; Ireland -- Social life and customs -- 19th century -- Fiction
It may save the reader some time, and relieve him from the weary task
of twice listening to the same story, if we steal some passages from a
letter which, about this time, Jack Massingbred addressed to his former
correspondent. He wrote from the inn at Oughterard, and, although still
under the influence of the excitement of the late contest, expressed
himself with much of his constitutional calm and frankness. We shall not
recapitulate his narrative of the election, but proceed at once to what
followed on that description.
“I see, Harry, the dubious projection of your nether lip, I appreciate
the slow nod of your head, and I fancy I can hear the little half-sigh
of deprecation with which you hear all this. Worse again, I don't seek
to defend myself. I think my case a bad one; but still I feel there is
something to be said in mitigation. You need not trouble yourself to
draw up an indictment: I plead guilty--entirely guilty--to all you
can say. I _have_ broken with 'the gentlemen' to cast my lot with the
_canaille_. Why have n't we a good wholesome word of our own for a
home-made article? I _have_ deserted the ranks where, whatever fortune
befell, it was honor to fight; I have given up association with
the well-bred and the well-mannered, to rub shoulders with the
coarse-minded, the rough-hearted, and the vulgar. There is not a
reproach you can make me on this score that I have n't already addressed
to myself. I feel all the indignity of my situation,--I experience
all the insult of their companionship; but, as the lady detected in
possession of her lover's picture pleaded in her defence that it was not
like him, so I hope to arrest judgment against me by the honest avowal
that I detest and despise my party. I don't talk to _you_ about their
principles--still less do I say anything of my own--but merely advert
here to the miserable compromise a gentleman is driven to make with
every sentiment of his nature who once enlists under their flag. As
Travers told us one evening--you were of the party, and must remember
it--he was speaking of the Peninsular campaign, in which he served as
a volunteer--'So long as you were fighting,' said he, 'it was all very
well; the fellows were stout-hearted and full of spirit, and you felt
that you couldn't ask for better comrades; but when the struggle was
over--when it came to associating, living with them, hearing their
sentiments, sharing their opinions, hopes, fears, wishes, and so
on--then it became downright degradation!' Not, as he remarked, that
they were one jot more vicious or more corrupt than their betters,
but that every vice and every corruption amongst them seemed doubly
offensive by the contact with their coarse natures. Now, my friends, the
Liberals, are somewhat in the same category. They do their work right
well on the field of battle; they fight, swear, slander, and perjure
themselves just like gentlemen; or rather better of the two. They even
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account