The Martyrdom of MadelineBuchanan, Robert Williams
General
The Martyrdom of Madeline
Buchanan, Robert Williams
Fiction
‘For God’s sake, Serena,’ cried Ponto, ‘don’t talk like that. I know you
don’t mean it, but the very expression is worthy that infernal scoundrel
MacAlpine. Not virile? Certainly not, and Heaven forbid! Virility,
dear master, is coarseness, ugliness, rudeness, and hideousness. Is
a rose-leaf virile? Are sweet shawms, exquisite scents, forlorn
pulsations, and cadences of sexless and impotent desire, are these
virile? The book of which we speak has been exquisitely called by a
contemporary the Golden Book of spirit and sense; nay more, “The Holy
Writ of Beauty!” In every page of it we feel the swooning consciousness,
the stinging and slaying scourge, of fruitless and rootless passion, and
the divine dew of incommunicable and luminous lust watering the spent
fibres of a parched and palpitating aesthetic dream. We feel more! We
feel that in realising this swoon of sensuous yet despairing pain, sharp
as tears, bitter as brine, and sinuous as the serpent, and in falling
back like a fountain to the ground from the heaven of eternally
unsatisfied longing and delight, we penetrate to the central mystery of
life, and see the white heart of the great rose of being pulsating with
one melodious throb of self-satiating and non-virile bliss!’
Serena yawned, for he had heard all this before, and he was not
particularly interested. As for the Frenchman, he listened and
applauded, with many shrugs and smiles, but there was a lurking
expression in his cat-like eye which showed that he was not altogether
blind to the absurdity of the fatuous Ponto.
It is not our intention further to place on record the lucubrations of
this typical critic of the period. The reader is doubtless familiar with
the kind of criticism of which he and such as he are the mouthpieces.
It has, perhaps, one redeeming merit--that of earnestness and
thoroughness--and even its characteristic nepotism should not blind us
to the fact that it reveals the existence of a real aspiration.
Arm-in-arm, Ponto and Gavrolles presently sallied forth, leaving Serena
to enjoy his quiet meerschaum alone. As they went, the Frenchman was
loud in praise of the painter, of his mighty genius and unassuming ways.
‘But this “Ophelia” whom he has painted,’ he cried presently, ‘is she so
fair as that?’
Ponto confessed that he seldom went to the theatre, and he had not seen
the original.
‘Ah, I am interested much,’ cried the other. ‘I must see her, I must
know her, when I return to London.’
They hailed a hansom and got into it together. As they drove along the
crowded streets in eager conversation, a young man, passing along on
foot, glanced at their faces, started, and gazed eagerly at Gavrolles.
The gaze only occupied a moment, then the vehicle was gone.
The young man was Edgar Sutherland, strolling along to his club.
‘That face!’ he muttered to himself, standing and looking after the
hansom. ‘Where have I seen it before? Is it possible? Good heavens, now
I remember! Can it be indeed the same?’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account