The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
The clergy were the most wealthy body in the state. La Noue reckons
one hundred episcopal and archiepiscopal sees in France, 650 abbeys
belonging to the orders of St. Bernard and St. Benedict, all
“beautified with good kitchens” and 2500 priories. Jean Bouchet has
left a curious picture of the clergy at the early part of the century,
and there are no grounds for believing that they had at all improved in
the interval before his death in 1555. He complains that the candidates
for holy orders possess all the qualities not wanted, and none that
are. Of the cardinals and bishops he says, they ought to preach the
Gospel, and be
Du peuple la lumière,
Le bon exemple et la clarté première.
Montluc, Bishop of Valence, declared in a sermon preached in 1559,
that out of ten priests there were eight who could not read. We may
charitably suppose that he exaggerates.
The clergy by no means dwelt together in unity, and their quarrels
became such a nuisance that, in 1542, the bishops were commanded to
put a stop to the practice of delivering abusive sermons from the
pulpit. The order would seem to have been ineffectual, for, in 1556,
the priests were forbidden to preach unless they had first submitted
their sermons to the diocesan. This regulation may have been partly
intended as a watch over heretical opinions; but in the same year the
procurator-general issued an order of Parliament against all such as
had indulged in “abusive language” in the pulpit. The fact is, that
the sixteenth century was one of singular excitement in every respect.
Society was in travail. The clergy shared in the general restlessness,
and the press not being quick enough, they resorted to their pulpits to
refute an antagonist, and preached sermons instead of writing leading
articles. They spared nobody who attacked them, or did not support
them. A friar of the order of Minims, Jean de Haas by name, preached
in his Advent sermons (Dec., 1561) so violently against the edict of
that year, and the king and queen-mother for sanctioning it, that the
provost was ordered to arrest him “early in the morning,” and take him
bound and gagged to St. Germains; but the citizens, immediately they
heard of his capture, marched out in crowds to the royal residence,
and, irritated with this “indignity,” as Pasquier terms it, demanded
the preacher back. The king was forced to give him up, and Jean
returned in triumph to Paris, “as if he were a great prince.” The
next day he celebrated his deliverance by a solemn procession to the
Church of St. Bartholomew.[186] At the beginning of 1572 Sorbin, the
king’s preacher, declaimed violently against the king because he would
not give immediate orders for murdering the Huguenots, and publicly
exhorted the Duke of Anjou to undertake the task himself, holding
out hopes to him of the primogeniture, as Jacob prevailed over Esau.
But the heretics could be as violent as the orthodox. The Huguenot
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account