The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
five livres six sols, with an additional couple of livres if the victim
was burned alive.
The savage punishments of the age tended to brutalize the manners of
the people, one evil thus fostering and reacting upon another. In the
small town of Provins, now so famous for its roses, there lived one
Crispin, who was accused of robbery and murder, tried, convicted, and
sentenced to be hanged. As he passed for a Huguenot, the priests, up to
the last moment, urged him to recant; but he remained firm--“_si ne
sçavoit pas bien lire ni écrire_.” In due course he was executed,
and the dead body left hanging on the gallows. A crowd of a hundred
boys or more, and none over twelve years old, gathered round the spot;
some of the more daring mounted the ladder, cut the rope and let the
corpse fall. A cord was now fastened round the neck, another round the
ankles, and the boys began to pull in different directions for the
mastery. As the sides were pretty evenly matched, a truce was agreed
upon, during which they got up a mock trial on the question, in what
manner a Huguenot ought to be dragged to the voirie or dunghill. The
juvenile court decided that “the said heretic should be dragged by the
heels like a dead beast,” and were actually pulling the body to the
Changy gate, when another gang of boys met them and insisted that the
body should be burned. A fire was kindled into which the corpse was
thrown, while a crowd of spectators looked on encouraging the boys by
words and gestures. After the body had lain some time in the flames,
it was again dragged out and thrown into the river, where a bargeman
cut off an ear and wore it as a trophy in his hat.[199] Comment upon
such an incident would be superfluous. It is a picture painted by a
contemporary of a state of society that had not existed in Europe since
the fall of Rome. The men of Provins who looked on approvingly while
the boys were making a plaything of Crispin’s lifeless body, were the
fathers of those who committed the atrocities of the Reign of Terror.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account