The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
Charles being only ten years old--he was born on the 27th June,
1550--his mother, with the approval of the council of state,[216]
assumed the authority though not the title of regent. Condé was
released from prison and Anthony made lieutenant-general of France,
while the Constable Montmorency resumed the superintendence of the
army, and Guise retained his place of grand-master. When the Constable
entered Orleans, he dismissed the soldiers he found at the gate: “I
will take care,” he said, “that the king shall travel safely, without
guard, all over the kingdom.”
The members of the States-General were silent but not unobservant
spectators of these things. Having been summoned to meet at Orleans by
Francis II., the curious constitutional question arose, Whether they
were not _ipso facto_ dissolved? but it was ingeniously argued,
that though the man may die, the king does not, and therefore their
sittings would be perfectly legal.
The States-General, or assembly of the three orders (clergy, nobles,
and commons), date from the beginning of the fourteenth century, when
Philip the Fair called them together on the occasion of his quarrel
with Pope Boniface VIII. They held but one session, yet, in that, they
proclaimed the temporal independence of France, and scattered forever
the ideas of universal monarchy entertained by the papacy. The States
met at indeterminate epochs, and were at one time in a fair way to
lead the European nations in the difficult path of representative
government. In the assembly held at Tours, in 1484, they called for
extensive reforms, and asserted a claim to be summoned every two
years. They went farther, and in language as bold as that of our
Petition of Rights, a century and a half later, declared that “the said
States-General expected that henceforward no taxes would be imposed on
the people until they had been consulted on the subject, nor unless
the imposition of such taxes should be made with their free-will and
consent, as the guardians and keepers of the liberties and privileges
of the realm.” These resolutions came to nothing: the crown continued
to levy taxes by proclamation, and nearly fourscore years elapsed
before the Estates[217] were called together again. And now in 1560,
when France was in great peril from internal commotions, they were
to meet once more in the city of Orleans. Even had the country been
entirely quiet, the financial condition of the state was such, that
extraordinary means of raising supplies would have been required.
The expenditure exceeded the annual revenue by ten millions, and
though such a deficit may be easily met by modern finance-ministers,
there were not three hundred years ago the same convenient methods of
filling an empty exchequer. The Guises knew that the summoning of the
States-General was a hostile measure aimed at them, but had not opposed
it for two reasons: firstly, it would relieve them of the unpopularity
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive