The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
Even the small concessions made by this edict were severely blamed
by the pope and the King of Spain;[227] while numerous outbreaks in
various parts of France--bloody protests against toleration, like our
own Gordon riots--showed that the people were very much divided in
their sentiments upon it. In order, therefore, to tranquillize the
public mind, the chancellor advised the queen-mother to consult the
Parliament of Paris on the best means of suppressing these religious
disorders. A solemn meeting was held in July (1561), Charles,
Catherine, and the chief nobility being present. The debate, which
De l’Hopital opened with a wise and conciliatory address, was long
and stormy. “We have not met to discuss points of doctrine,” he said,
“but to deliberate on the best means of preventing the dissensions
occasioned by the difference of religious opinion, and to put an end
to the license and rebellion of which that difference has hitherto
proved a constant source. The devil has entered into these contests,
and no one thinks of reforming himself.” In other words, religion
was a mere pretext. The parliament was much divided: some contended
that the edicts against the Huguenots ought to be wholly suspended
until a meeting of the National Council; another that they should be
carried out more strictly; while a third party were of opinion that
the sole cognizance of heresy should be assigned to the bishops, and
that a severe penalty, short of death, should be inflicted upon all
who assembled, even peacefully, for religious worship.[228] This
proposal was carried by a majority of three votes, and the result was
the Edict of July, 1561, forbidding, under pain of death, the use of
insulting terms, and any act of violence under color of religion. All
public and private meetings were interdicted; the bishops were still
to take cognizance of the crime of heresy, but the penalties were
restricted to banishment; and, finally, the king granted a general
amnesty, on condition that every body lived peaceably and catholically.
The Huguenots gained little by this decree beyond the abolition of
the death penalty in cases of heresy; indeed, it actually diminished
the toleration they already enjoyed; and yet the Parliament of Paris
would only register it provisionally, on the ground that it was too
favorable. That this opinion was not shared by the Huguenots is clear
from a hymn written on the occasion, of which the following is a
portion:
Quant à moi, je ne peux vivre
Qu’avec ce qu’il interdit;
Aussi le mien corps je livre
Aux peines de son Édit.
Qu’il me commande exiler,
Qu’il fasse mes os brûler,
Qu’il m’étrangle d’une corde,
Je le veux et m’y accorde....
N’aie donc, ô peuple, crainte
Du supplice qui t’attend,
Car cette dure contrainte
Jusqu’à l’âme ne s’étend.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account