The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
The favor shown to the Huguenots greatly annoyed the orthodox party.
Old Montmorency was greatly scandalized that Condé, Coligny, and others
ate meat in Lent; and that Archbishop Montluc, brother of the brutal
soldier of that name, openly preached that it was not wrong to pray
to God in French, and that the Scriptures ought to be translated into
the vulgar tongue. The halls of St. Germain’s and Fontainebleau were
thrown open to Huguenot ministers, and “it seemed as if the whole court
had become Calvinist,” says the Jesuit Maimbourg. Catherine received
the Protestant leaders with favor, and assumed the character of a
devout inquirer after truth.[230] Chantonnay, the Spanish embassador,
scarcely wrote a letter to his royal master in which he did not
complain of the toleration shown to heretics,[231] and of the influence
of the admiral, whose chaplain often preached to a congregation of
more than 300 persons. Another time he writes: “The day after Easter
Sunday the public preachings in the great court of Fontainebleau,
before the lodgings of Admiral Coligny, in the presence of M. de Condé,
have been forbidden.” On the 9th July he says that not a day passes
without preaching “in the mansion of some lord or lady of the court.”
The same busy correspondent informs us that in August, 1561, Beza
preached in the hotel of the Prince of Condé at St. Germains and in
the royal palace, and that the Reformed ministers “were more confident
than the Catholic.” At another time we read that, in consequence of
the favor shown to the heretics, there had occurred every day at
Paris and elsewhere, “seditions, tumults, and murders of Protestants
and Catholics.”[232] A little later Chantonnay mentions that certain
bishops, adopting the doctrine and language of the heretics, called for
reform in the Church; and that the clergy were made a laughing-stock in
the presence even of the papal legate. “After supper the other evening,
when the cardinal-legate was with the queen, the king, his brother the
Duke of Orleans, and the Prince of Bearn, entered the room, followed
by many others, all of them dressed up as cardinals, bishops, abbots,
and priests, riding upon asses, and each carrying on the crupper behind
him a page dressed as a loose woman.[233] There was a good laugh at
it, and they continue to amuse themselves, calling the Prince of Bearn
legate, because he was dressed as a cardinal.” The nuncio complained of
this masque, for which Catherine apologized as being “only a childish
jest.” Margaret of Valois, afterward wife of Henry IV., writes in her
memoirs that “all the court was infected with heresy,” that “many of
the lords and ladies tried to convert her,” that “her brother of Anjou
[afterward Henry III.] had not escaped the unhappy influence, and that
he used to throw her prayer-book into the fire and give her Huguenot
hymns instead.” Considering that Margaret was at this time barely
eight years old, her testimony, given nearly forty years later, is
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account