The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
age, and occupations. The Cardinal of Lorraine, after some well-turned
compliments, declared that the difference in the Christian churches
on transubstantiation and consubstantiation were not in his opinion a
sufficient cause of schism. Beza replied: “We hold the bread to be the
sacramental body, and we define _sacramentaliter_ by maintaining,
that though the body be now in heaven and nowhere else, and the
signs on earth with us, yet it is as truly given and received by us,
through faith in eternal life, as the sign is given naturally by the
hands.” The cardinal, turning to the queen-mother, observed: “Such is
my belief, madam, and I am satisfied.” Beza took advantage of this
unexpected concession to add, “And these are the Sacramentarians who
have been so long and so cruelly persecuted and slandered.”
Early on the morning of the 9th of September, 1561, Beza left St.
Germain’s for Poissy (a small town about four leagues from Paris),
escorted by a brilliant train of gentlemen, among whom must have been
many of his old friends.[242] The members of the council, or colloquy
as it was termed, in order not to wound the susceptibility of the papal
court, assembled in the refectory of the great convent. The king, then
only eleven years of age, presided, and around him were gathered the
princes of the blood royal, with the officers and ladies of the court.
On the two sides of the hall were ranged, according to their rank,
six cardinals with archbishops and bishops to the number of forty and
more, besides a vast array of doctors and lawyers who accompanied these
prelates, all in scarlet or purple robes. Along the lower part of the
room ran a bar, but the space beyond it was empty, the Protestants
not being as yet admitted into the presence of the king. Charles IX.
opened the proceedings by reading a formal speech, in which he said
that he hoped “they would inquire into the things necessary to be
reformed, without passion or prejudice, but solely for God’s honor,
the discharge of their consciences, and the public peace.”...“What I
desire,” he continued, “is that you will not separate until you have
put matters into such good order that my subjects may live together
in peace and unity.”[243] He was followed by Chancellor de l’Hopital,
who, by the king’s express order, kept his seat while speaking. After
a formal explanatory introduction he went on, “I caution you against
subtle and curious questions that lead to nothing. We do not require
many books, but only to understand thoroughly the Word of God, and to
live in conformity with it as well as we can. The ministers of the new
sect have been invited hither by his majesty to confer with you. I pray
you receive them as a father receives his children, and graciously
teach and instruct them, so that they can not hereafter say, they were
condemned unheard.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account