The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
Although the colloquy came to nothing, the actual result was a victory
to the Huguenots by clearing their character from the many aspersions
cast upon it. They had shown that they were not disloyal subjects,
and were not in the habit of practicing infamous crimes; and their
faith spread so rapidly in consequence, that the demand for pastors to
preside over the new congregations was greater than the Swiss churches
could supply. The countenance of the court gave them boldness. During
the sittings at Poissy they assembled by thousands outside the walls
of Paris to listen to Beza, whose enemies have computed his hearers
at 8000, and whose friends at 50,000.[251] The smaller number appears
quite large enough for any voice to reach in the open air. Necessity
very early compelled these congregations to assume a sort of military
formation. The women and children were placed in the centre nearest
the preacher; behind them stood the men on foot, next came the men
on horseback, and outside all were ranged armed men, soldiers or
arquebusiers, to protect the unarmed crowd. As Paris was particularly
lawless, Condé collected a volunteer guard of about 400 gentlemen,
to whom were added 300 old soldiers under Andelot, with 300 students
and as many citizens. Certainly no public worship was safe without
some such precautions, but the wisdom of such a display of force, when
private worship was possible, is open to doubt.
From a list presented to the queen-mother about this time by Coligny,
it would seem that there were more than 2000 Reformed and organized
churches in France. Some have calculated the Huguenots to number
one-half of the population, while the least sanguine reckoned them at
one-tenth. The Chancellor l’Hopital estimated that “a fourth part of
the kingdom was separated from the communion of the Church.” This part,
he adds, “consists of gentlemen, of the principal citizens, and of such
members of the poorer sort as have seen the world and are accustomed
to bear arms. They have with them more than three-fourths of the men
of letters, and a great proportion of the large and good houses,
both of the nobility and third estate, being on their side, they do
not want money to carry on their affairs.”[252] To the same effect
wrote Castelnau; and Micheli, the Venetian embassador, one of the
shrewdest of observers, declared that there was no province of France
untainted by Protestantism; and that Normandy and Brittany, Gascony
and Languedoc, Poitou and Touraine, Provence and Dauphiny--comprising
three-fourths of the kingdom--were full of it. “In many provinces,”
he says, “meetings are held, sermons preached, and rules of life
adopted, entirely in accordance with the example of Geneva, and without
any regard to the royal prohibition. Every one has embraced these
opinions, and, what is most remarkable, even the religious body, not
only priests, monks, and nuns--very few of the convents have escaped
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account