The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
Both armies now retired to winter-quarters: Coligny leading the remnant
of the Huguenot forces to Orleans, and Guise returning to Paris with an
escort of 2400 Spanish arquebusiers. Now that St. André was killed and
Montmorency a prisoner, the duke found himself the most powerful man
in the kingdom. Reorganizing his troops and being strongly reinforced,
he marched out early next year to lay siege to Orleans, for winter
brought little cessation to the strife. Coligny, who was in great
want of money, had moved into Normandy, to re-open his communications
with England, having left his brother Andelot in command of the city.
The latter, though suffering severely from a quartan ague, took the
most active measures of defense; but Guise was no mean soldier, and
had had large experience in sieges. He captured one of the suburbs by
assault; his lines drawing closer every day effectually cut off all
succor; the admiral was too weak to attempt to raise the siege, and the
duke had fixed the final attack for the 19th February. Writing to the
queen-regent, he expressed a hope that she would not be displeased if
he destroyed every thing within the walls, “even to the dogs and rats,”
and sowed the foundations of the city with salt. It is probable that
there would have been a terrible massacre; but just as all hope seemed
lost, the hand of an assassin brought deliverance (18th February,
1563). On his death-bed Duke Francis attempted to justify himself for
the atrocities at Vassy, protesting that he had neither premeditated
nor ordered them. But death-bed confessions are rarely authentic
enough to be relied on: they are too often colored by the report of
interested witnesses.[326] On this point Maimbourg and Varillas are at
variance--the latter affirming that the duke prayed God to pardon all
his faults, “except that of Vassy.” He is also reported to have sent a
message to the queen-regent, advising her to make peace without delay,
adding that “the man who would prevent it is an enemy to the king and
state.” The near approach of death had probably brought that wisdom and
calm judgment in which he was so deficient, for only a month earlier
Throckmorton wrote of him: “The duke will in no wise accord to peace
till the Protestants be utterly exterminated.”[327] When Catherine
heard the news of his murder, she spoke her mind pretty plainly about
him: “The man is dead I hated most of all the world.” And when Condé
characterized his death as the removal of a burden, she continued: “If
the kingdom has been relieved of one burden, ten have been taken off my
bosom.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account