The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
The times were favorable for peace. The Duke of Guise dead and the
constable a prisoner, there was no one to take the command of the
royal army. “I was obliged to command it myself,” said Catherine, “for
Brissac was so ill that he could not leave his bed.” On the other hand,
the Prince of Condé, with all his desire for liberty, was unwilling to
change “the soft air of the court and the smiles of the ladies” for
the austerities of the Huguenot camp. His offer to become the channel
of negotiations between the two religions was accepted, though not
without opposition from the embassadors of Philip II. and the pope,
who were for continuing the war. The Duke of Tuscany expressed his
dissatisfaction at the negotiations; and the queen-regent, to quiet
them, seems to have hinted that the pacification would be only a trap.
Santa Croce writes: “If any opportunity is found of infringing the
articles of this treaty, they will not be kept.... Should the queen
do as she promises, means will be found of punishing these people
when they are disarmed and dispersed.” But the peace party was too
strong, and the terms of a treaty were soon agreed upon. Before finally
accepting them, the Prince of Condé consulted the synod then assembled
at Orleans; but that impracticable body, while claiming absolute
liberty for themselves, would have denied it to those whom they
called “atheists, libertines, and anabaptists.” As it would have been
useless to attempt to reconcile the extreme fanatics on both sides,
the Pacification of Amboise was signed on the 19th March, 1563. The
right of public worship conceded by the Edict of January was greatly
restricted, the Huguenots being no longer permitted to assemble outside
the walls of the cities, but only in a single place within every
bailliage inhabited by Protestant nobles and their retainers. On the
other hand, one clause expressly bore that “every man should live at
liberty in his own house, without search or molestation, and without
being vexed or constrained for conscience’ sake.” Although the treaty
was acceptable to the majority of the Huguenot party, who were growing
tired of the war, all were not equally pleased. The admiral, who had
protested against it, characterized it by a single phrase: “That stroke
of the pen throws down more churches than the enemy’s soldiers could
have destroyed in ten years.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account