The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
These party questions were momentarily silenced by the necessity of
getting rid of the foreign garrison which still occupied Havre. The
Huguenots, as well as the Catholics, were pleased at the opportunity
of showing their prowess against “the natural enemy of France.” The
former, aware of the great blunder they had committed in the treaty of
Hampton Court, were eager to drive out the English, who did not feel
the slightest inclination to depart. Queen Elizabeth’s policy may have
been national, but it was very shabby and prejudicial to the Huguenot
cause. “We are resolutely determined to keep Newhaven [Havre], except
they will resolve to restore us Calais,” wrote Cecil on Christmas Day,
1562.[352] When he heard that peace had been made at Orleans “without
consideration of us,” he added: “If it be so, I know the worst, which
is, by stout and stiff dealing, to make our own bargain.”[353] And yet,
after these big words, the English government did nothing, though the
governor of Havre (the Earl of Warwick) urgently demanded supplies and
reinforcements, which did not sail until the place had capitulated.
With sanctimonious resignation Sir E. Warner wrote to Cecil: “The loss
of Newhaven so suddenly and in such sort, as it seemeth, I am sorry
for to the bottom of my heart. But against God’s ordinance no man can
stand.” The garrison had suffered terribly from the plague, which they
brought with them to England, where it is computed to have killed
20,000 persons in London and the out-parishes.
Condé, who had fought valiantly at Havre, hoped that his services
to the monarchy would be repaid by promotion to the office of
Lieutenant-General of France, vacant by the death of his elder brother,
Anthony of Navarre. Catherine had held this out as a lure without
the remotest intention of keeping her promise. She probably found
that the throne would be weakened by being kept longer in tutelage,
and therefore, with L’Hopital’s concurrence, anticipated the young
king’s majority by twelve months, ordering it to be declared as soon
as he entered his fourteenth year, and thus obviated the necessity
of appointing a new lieutenant-general. The ceremony took place at
Rouen, it being feared that the Parliament of Paris, in which Condé had
friends, would refuse to register the edict of majority. On the 17th
August, 1563, Charles went down to the courts of law in great state,
and after announcing the close of his minority, he declared that he
would not permit the repetition of such acts of insubordination as he
had witnessed during the recent hostilities, and that he desired the
Edict of Pacification should be kept in all its provisions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account