The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
As soon as the Spanish troops had crossed the frontier and entered the
Netherlands, it was expected that the royal army would be disbanded;
but, instead of that, it was marched to the neighborhood of Paris. This
was of itself quite enough to excite the alarm of the Huguenot leaders,
who were farther startled by information of a plot to seize both Condé
and the admiral; to imprison the former for life, and put the other to
death; and to place garrisons in the towns favorable to the Reformed
religion, the exercise of which was to be prohibited all over the
kingdom.[386] The heads of the Huguenot party immediately took council
with the admiral at his castle of Chatillon. Their deliberations were
long and serious. No doubt seems to have been entertained regarding the
truth of the report. The suspicions aroused by the Bayonne meeting,
corroborated by stories of the projected massacre at Moulins, which
failed only because the Huguenots were present in too great number,
were strengthened by the insolence of Anjou and the queen-mother’s
insincerity. The edicts of toleration had not been fairly brought into
operation; new interpretation edicts were continually encroaching
upon the privileges of the Reformed; Alva was at hand in Flanders to
assist in carrying out the scheme he had suggested only a few months
before. Men in a panic never reason fairly, never indeed examine into
the truth of the rumors by which their alarm has been roused. It was
so in the present instance when the more violent party said: “Shall
we tarry until they come and bind us hand and foot, and so draw us
unto their scaffold at Paris, there by our shameful deaths to glut
others’ cruelty? Do we not see the foreign enemy marching armed toward
us, and threatening to be revenged on us for Dreux? Have we forgotten
that about 3000 of our religion have, since the peace, endured violent
deaths, for whom we can have no redress? If it were our king’s will we
should be thus injured, we might perhaps the better bear it; but shall
we bear the insolence of those who shroud themselves under his name and
try to alienate his good-will from us? For more than forty years our
fathers professed the true religion in secret, and endured all sorts
of tortures and injuries with patience inexhaustible. If we who are
so numerous, and who are able to profess our religion openly, should
betray a righteous cause by a disgraceful silence and unseasonable
moderation, we should fall into an apostasy unworthy of the two goodly
titles of Christian and gentleman. We should be wanting not only to
ourselves but to God, and besides losing our own souls should be the
cause of ruin to others.”[387] Coligny advised them to be patient: “I
see clearly how we may rekindle the fire,” he said; “but not where we
may find water to quench it.” His brother Andelot was for more vigorous
measures: “If we wait until we are shut up in prison, what will our
patience avail us? If we give our enemies the advantage of striking
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account