The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
Short as the war had been it was full of horrors. Wherever the two
armies passed the country was laid waste. The towns-people were
comparatively safe behind their walls, but the peasantry were between
two millstones: there was no escaping except by flight to the woods
and leaving the fields uncultivated, the consequence of which was
famine and pestilence. In Schiller’s picturesque language, “men
became savage like their countries.”[410] After the proclamation of
peace a few governors did all they could to check the disorders of
the royal troops in their provinces. Marshal Damville, commanding in
Guienne, Poitou, and Dauphiny, issued many regulations to pacify the
country and restrain the license of the soldiery, who had assumed the
administrations of several towns by turning out the magistrates and
substituting drum-head justice for the regular courts of law. They
appropriated the contents of the city chests, and the only limits to
their extortions were the means of the citizens to pay. Many large
towns had been half deserted by their inhabitants, who in despair had
formed into volunteer partisan corps, which roamed over the country,
making the roads unsafe, and plundering friend and foe alike. They were
under a rude kind of military discipline, resembling in this as in
other respects the brigand bands of modern Greece and Southern Italy.
To remedy this great evil, Damville ordered the officers and soldiers
to permit the exiles to return on condition that they gave up their
arms, gentlemen and others having the privilege of wearing swords being
excepted. Charles himself frequently complained that the provincial
governors did not attempt to carry out the treaty of Longjumeau. On the
31st March he wrote to Condé regretting that the edict of toleration
had not been observed as fully as he had desired, and declared it to be
his wish that all his subjects, without respect of religion, should be
protected alike. He grieved that justice was not so purely administered
as it ought to be--a state of things he would remedy as far as possible.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account